IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Mon, 22 March 2010 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC143A69F1 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CdDAualTWr0s for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7613A6B06 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.28.166] (dhcp-wireless-open-abg-28-166.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.28.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2MK1ErQ009158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BA7CC89.9070507@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:01:13 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mallman@icir.org
References: <20100322191118.1F267B91393@lawyers.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100322191118.1F267B91393@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4A8CE4AF4846DD90823F3BE0"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:03:45 -0000


Mark Allman wrote:
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-02.txt
>>
>> Please respond if you either:
>>
>> (1) Support making this document a WG document with the
>>     target for Informational.
>>
>> (2) Oppose making this document a WG document.
>>
>> Of course, other comments are also welcome :).
> 
> I think (1) is fine.  I don't really think this document is needed, but
> I also don't think it hurts anything as a clarification.

That's my view as well.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email