IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719DE21F8CF2 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUy8BPTxntuj for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com [72.246.2.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F357C21F89EF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A08CF9C3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com [172.17.50.21]) by prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E9CF2EE for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (callahan.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.17.12.11]) by prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9498FE09A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:54 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <51239189.2060504@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:51:53 -0500
From: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <511E92E9.6080709@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <511E92E9.6080709@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:58 -0000

On 02/15/2013 02:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 1. do you agree with change (A)?

Yes.

>
> 2. do you agree with change (B)?

Yes, provided that "OK to indicate multiple assignees" means that the 
multiple assignees should all agree.

>
> 3. do you agree with change (C)?

Yes. i looks better due to size, iii is next.


--Brandon

-- 
Brandon Williams; Principal Software Engineer
Cloud Engineering; Akamai Technologies Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email