Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Sat, 16 February 2013 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8263021F85A0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:42:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKrr-EEalS+7 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:42:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E945E21F859D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1G0gXOP013140 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:42:33 -0500
Received: (qmail 31887 invoked by uid 0); 16 Feb 2013 00:42:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.145?) (wes@mti-systems.com@69.81.143.143) by 0 with ESMTPA; 16 Feb 2013 00:42:33 -0000
Message-ID: <511ED5F2.4030100@mti-systems.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:42:26 -0500
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <511ED5B3.1040803@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <511ED5B3.1040803@mti-systems.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <511ED5B3.1040803@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:42:35 -0000

On 2/15/2013 2:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> Here's what we need to know:
> 
> 1. do you agree with change (A)?
> 
> 2. do you agree with change (B)?
> 
> 3. do you agree with change (C)?
> 



A) YES

B) YES (but should be clear that requesters can "suggest" a value)

C) YES (prefer option i)


-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems