Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

"Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 22 February 2013 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F276E21F8763 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:23:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.860, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8sk-5ku0OqW for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0217521F8722 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id r1M8N0YP011012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:23:22 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.56]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.64]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:23:02 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:23:01 +0100
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
Thread-Index: Ac4L3oZKRSQb+s5IR36Bk7x0tYTjNgE9lWoA
Message-ID: <2A886F9088894347A3BE0CC5B7A85F3E9AA10D6224@FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <511ED5B3.1040803@mti-systems.com> <511ED5F2.4030100@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <511ED5F2.4030100@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:23:28 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:42 AM
> To: tcpm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to 
> draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
> 
> On 2/15/2013 2:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> > 
> > Here's what we need to know:
> > 
> > 1. do you agree with change (A)?
> > 
> > 2. do you agree with change (B)?
> > 
> > 3. do you agree with change (C)?
> 
> A) YES
> 
> B) YES (but should be clear that requesters can "suggest" a value)
> 
> C) YES (prefer option i)

As individual TCPM contributor, I agree with Joe and Wes.

As co-chair, I would really appreciate further opinions, most notably regarding change (C).

Michael