Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

[Wesley Eddy <[e-mail]>]

On 2/22/2013 1:45 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>     Frankly, I'm not sure the IESG is ready to approve this, even with
>> a fixed-length nonce. Wes has been supportive of this I-D; but Wes will
>> be off the IESG by the time this could return. Five Abstains is a
>> pretty stiff barrier (though I have seen more).
> 
> Some of those positions might be changed based on this update.


As I understand them, those ballots *should* be able to change
based on some of the modifications Joe proposed.

Some of them were, in my opinion, based on a misunderstanding of
what the goals were, and AD's envisioning their own personal
criteria that wasn't consistent with what the WG originally shot
for.

I think these changes will bring it within expectations.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems