IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Sat, 16 February 2013 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E6F21F84C7 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAQGXYNA8BDQ for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA4721F8484 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fr10so4030329lab.12 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cLDh5GiRE+l1D7PvQw3cfHsJYydFyRH02yLWLgAGtvs=; b=cMNT51OrC6ooi96pC0J8PA9zzEFEgcKwAYDmVINTIIj5A2dUFIWXVLWoezlZhgQv7u iWwOlZSRe0sTZilq5f0ixhjpkbcYiWg8SXsEUrpm+sVtuy87O1oHRbQCrlJV2OX44Qy5 0tzDmeoRBfj0vS7JgrfrPUZKOUj8AbdDzF8bDS3EOn3p/+jMqPq6cS/ro3x2FNsbpTSe 52YfIUd4ob2PjhRRBp8RDIXld/0J7fPxOuZHbWILVm3T8cWBO7OKzyy7aaJeH98ciowq OzcfUf586hpgkWu7GCMNmIw72q/J9zU4P+hN14PqaGz7mbUYxoI4P7rvGus8kpOdb89D tExg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=cLDh5GiRE+l1D7PvQw3cfHsJYydFyRH02yLWLgAGtvs=; b=p3YQjpD0BtYaWttbskp6h/5OtEa17ZcSayq6dI9RXra5Hz+n4l6Cf9O6ILO+fraxGv ti0uvNHwEuoghD0c3cDFGwa9Zyf0ZBb7l0zvvcgfvjqHCYRbgSUOJP0oeU/ZvU4R6JoK YdPUMCOiQfw2WZI1NdndY9A52Jkxsd7GfP6hSc6zpy+PDj6UeoIF+9QD1iO19TjF/OV5 XRB+E9t3Ofn+86kRKmNDLg7A0WpFTm1e+nVJJuUA2l3lSlrjYiocn0b4fA5H4EsgXh/2 +UMq/0ak4o5njspv94F2Dvp8SKY7yKe3d6oMCHGZcXS2nhVK893KZk2AEeWBODyl2Do2 1ntw==
X-Received: by 10.112.36.71 with SMTP id o7mr540195lbj.47.1360976658820; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.128.225 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:03:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511ED5F2.4030100@mti-systems.com>
References: <511ED5B3.1040803@mti-systems.com> <511ED5F2.4030100@mti-systems.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:03:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=ftddAMG9fMWcHrUfPruxusQu7Gbt9b42Py+gtRVrLyBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPj8PrzMX7e9brzSIJVvy+4poCOWTk2ZvufHlrpLOGbec1aqj0S8ToLy84ftQWZ2SvO4p/f1tkUvFDhN6URIRC/jYm9eUFSDaFaG1YOorw6kYnxSItTIumLtDtiyQ1Yn72pb7bTMjZpxO/a4RBxsXj2rPf7lSn5hlqFeGklHd8Od8AyzkkyMypurrlpGCcP1+AS1BW
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:04:21 -0000

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
> On 2/15/2013 2:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>> Here's what we need to know:
>>
>> 1. do you agree with change (A)?
>>
>> 2. do you agree with change (B)?
>>
>> 3. do you agree with change (C)?
>>
>
>
>
> A) YES
>
> B) YES (but should be clear that requesters can "suggest" a value)
>
> C) YES (prefer option i)

same votes as Wes and Joe.

>
>
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email