IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options

Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE5A21F8D76 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KcN1mJRE43Z for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:50:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com [72.246.2.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F59821F8CC5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2B7CF2EE; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com [172.17.50.21]) by prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68233CF240; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (callahan.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.17.12.11]) by prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E3AFE1B4; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5123BB67.9080805@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:50:31 -0500
From: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
References: <511E92E9.6080709@isi.edu> <51239189.2060504@akamai.com> <5123B50A.1050001@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5123B50A.1050001@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] request for feedback - proposed update to draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:50:33 -0000

On 02/19/2013 12:23 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
> On 2/19/2013 6:51 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 02:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> 1. do you agree with change (A)?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>
>>> 2. do you agree with change (B)?
>>
>> Yes, provided that "OK to indicate multiple assignees" means that the
>> multiple assignees should all agree.
>
> So what if they don't?
>
> Or, more specifically, what if they:
>
> 	- refuse
> 	- cannot be contacted
>
> Or should we just say that the IANA list is the 'first to file', and
> don't really list anything else?
>
> Joe
>

My thinking is that one of the goals of a registry would be to avoid 
collisions, which suggests that 'first to file' language would be good. 
I don't think it's absolutely necessary to disallow multiple assignees, 
but would prefer that to an approach that too readily allows collisions.

--Brandon

-- 
Brandon Williams; Principal Software Engineer
Cloud Engineering; Akamai Technologies Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email