Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization

Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC2F3A1756 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGRBIGzo3O-S for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E543A1762 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id q11so8844254pln.11 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=1suWzCOpiS+FUAwLnrqAXsAkQs1zL3lFHFVblJG0Sls=; b=ewUQgx4ySy/CX811YoR5HUdoucsEWR/zc0rkBITTJjDIWxJmD8jpA4OeAhsFywq38K 7DrP2LrOdGYl0UUBgZofM+woQ8gtOEXXcCynkR8XICIbKJlavfvsc/LDTTPBD6ISNmgb yOEDaiFBjWZLiCoc5lJlPR/XFBfAKfF57KT8r535n/CXRC+fcRWnRyJGkV8JtSpl5jRP I8ddt90amyDdgsykiTtBL3QbuxTJfyTRwl+o47f8s/iPD//jeXSsFeb5816ERf6Amur3 ugwdJzeEL/fDl1wPNgvOoaG+OmxCK/mcwZZOHJ1kNGRq/nnIEQiv6L7yDg+PVpW+mwdn aSIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=1suWzCOpiS+FUAwLnrqAXsAkQs1zL3lFHFVblJG0Sls=; b=W/TrETxKNjdRH2trU44F/aXIivQV8g3I57YnXuOwIqwhidBSjZWv2l/5rHk/pFuKKP 7WW850rgQjViwIhGkQk95AFPtERTESUO1jVhfSWXkBD/s561cWsK2DygpWkkXfePTaHe QGiMXWxEEf00+fX2tppVFVWQiPrzXYKClgSpalrsKlyl7EzPzMqIhqdXh4l7YBKr49y2 +1VtLbQbbeKkPiIGYKZ/muBK+4YtOU/c3+V6U9cfHGLRSUb2/VvnUMMYtEfNa1WDAUWd rJTFeHu3GDwPlvuCPxxVm6eiVJZADJgdkXXthE2urgKHguvBFkeBfpZ+xzMbtVz0HLS5 Cpmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Vby+Zg7HDTkezDee+3EpEdU9T7MwiumovUN4S+b4WgEZhqeZm eELrHMSoW8Zdtl235520ugEBJ/8PviYcJK8m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxns8BLW0ZFP64+6BLPJuLPzweoVJRK2dBpE6gPnibQJrN/WhLIU8Y16P5Hwt4z0C7Qhr/AIw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3e8b:b0:1c7:852d:e843 with SMTP id rj11-20020a17090b3e8b00b001c7852de843mr14061261pjb.244.1648230998625; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (jpams-nat13.juniper.net. [193.110.49.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 22-20020a17090a019600b001c6457e1760sm6847575pjc.21.2022.03.25.10.56.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9191AF9E-6FA7-43AF-B4DC-55F0B046BDAB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_700FD904-D878-4625-9178-2168350F29AE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:56:36 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAO8-O7pm7aznKmt--2Dfgtf=ZZ=o2xtjjRoLLOVMLpG6KP8_pw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <042601d84029$1de567c0$59b03740$@olddog.co.uk> <c4e7e5c0-81a2-7f62-c81a-8f672eccd6db@joelhalpern.com> <DB9PR06MB7915CE12BC9DE1E9F62309E29E1A9@DB9PR06MB7915.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <CAO8-O7pm7aznKmt--2Dfgtf=ZZ=o2xtjjRoLLOVMLpG6KP8_pw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Xx7x_S_n6lZoG9vlzQ2T--NGGV0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:56:45 -0000

Hi,

I have only one comment, regarding below:

  the "IETF Network
  Slice" which is the realization of the service in the provider's 
  network achieved by partitioning network resources and by
  applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see
  Section 3.1).

‘Achieved by partitioning network resources’ is some specific relation option, which might (or might not) be used in particular realization (depending how the slice is realized, might be entire network is single partition). Hence, it should rather be omitted here, as it should be agnostic to to the actual realization. Thus, I would change it to:

  the "IETF Network
  Slice" which is the realization of the service in the provider's 
  network achieved by
  applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see
  Section 3.1).


Regards,
Krzysztof


> On 2022 -Mar-25, at 12:48, Jalil, Luay <luay.jalil=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:luay.jalil=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Regards,
> Luay
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:49 AM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com <mailto:luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Agree, the proposed change is ok.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Luis
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>> En nombre de Joel M. Halpern
> Enviado el: viernes, 25 de marzo de 2022 10:30
> Para: teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
> Asunto: Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization
> 
> Works for me.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 3/25/2022 5:17 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First in a series of emails to resolve the open issues mentioned
> > during the TEAS meeting.
> >
> > We have, for the longest time, suffered from a blurring between the
> > service provided to the customer, and how that service is engineered in the network.
> > This leads us to talk about VPNs in a way where sometimes a VPN is
> > what the customer gets and sometimes it is what the operator
> > engineers. A good example is the term "MPLS VPN" as though the
> > customer cares whether the VPN is provided using MPLS technology.
> >
> > We have, to some extent, clarifies this with recent YANG "Customer
> > Service Models" that describe the service offered to the customer, but
> > do not constrain the provider's choice of implementation technology or options.
> >
> > As the discussion of IETF Network Slices continues, I have repeatedly
> > seen some blurring between the topics of the "IETF Network Slice
> > Service" and the "IETF Network Slice." It seems to me that this mixing
> > of concepts will continue as future readers pick up the document.
> >
> > Although I have tried to use the two terms clearly and distinctly, the
> > document is missing a clear statement to disambiguate the two.
> >
> > Section 3 provides the definitions of the two terms at some length
> > using subsections. The clarification would get lost if it was placed
> > at the bottom of the section after the subsections, so I propose to
> > include some text near the top of section as follows.
> >
> > OLD
> >     IETF Network Slices are created to meet specific requirements,
> >     typically expressed as bandwidth, latency, latency variation, and
> >     other desired or required characteristics.  Creation of an IETF
> >     Network Slice is initiated by a management system or other
> >     application used to specify network-related conditions for particular
> >     traffic flows in response to an actual or logical IETF Network Slice
> >     service request.
> >
> >     Once created, these slices can be monitored, modified, deleted, and
> >     otherwise managed.
> >
> >     Applications and components will be able to use these IETF Network
> >     Slices to move packets between the specified end-points of the
> >     service in accordance with specified characteristics.
> > NEW
> >     IETF Network Slices are created to meet specific requirements,
> >     typically expressed as bandwidth, latency, latency variation, and
> >     other desired or required characteristics.  Creation of an IETF
> >     Network Slice is initiated by a management system or other
> >     application used to specify network-related conditions for particular
> >     traffic flows in response to an actual or logical IETF Network Slice
> >     service request.
> >
> >     Once created, these slices can be monitored, modified, deleted, and
> >     otherwise managed.
> >
> >     Applications and components will be able to use these IETF Network
> >     Slices to move packets between the specified end-points of the
> >     service in accordance with specified characteristics.
> >
> >     A clear distinction should be made between the "IETF Network
> >     Slice service" which is the function delivered to the customer
> >     (see Section 3.2) and which is agnostic to the technologies and
> >     Mechanisms used by the service provider, and the "IETF Network
> >     Slice" which is the realization of the service in the provider's
> >     network achieved by partitioning network resources and by
> >     applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see
> >     Section 3.1).
> > END
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e=> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e=> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
> 
> The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.
> 
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e=> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas