Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization
"Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 11:49 UTC
Return-Path: <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CDF3A1172 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=b6pigYUl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b=pYhMRWZH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0x8B_-ieipo for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com (mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com [148.163.153.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DA53A11A5 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0112646.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 22PB40Qq019791 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:49:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon.com; h=mime-version : references : in-reply-to : from : date : message-id : subject : to : cc : content-type; s=corp; bh=QmYHeON1gajVgJO6VXpRQddITJaBhiSChmfnR1sjfcI=; b=b6pigYUl4JH2pJZ4JW2naYSICOxNdiVANE4PFRdkJI/A+veB+NkkmKE3fb6qA1sVbbkK ptqCEzWusAV4lY6wIViDic4y8mucXECR5gAa/Z7osbRkQ8LbUKtGpz99vavFWRC3S3CS aiFb7nv3OWLsQ+PhxA3UuyzL83BoO8Y1h1A=
Received: from mail-oi1-f197.google.com (mail-oi1-f197.google.com [209.85.167.197]) by mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3f1c090m98-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:49:08 -0400
Received: by mail-oi1-f197.google.com with SMTP id c3-20020aca3503000000b002d48224d7e8so4262835oia.4 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QmYHeON1gajVgJO6VXpRQddITJaBhiSChmfnR1sjfcI=; b=pYhMRWZHlhrJbm9Gg1y9fTqVsMytBCPTBjqg+atB577NCygoZKlWHkOlu6/oQmcrTk 260nFc0XZGx5kPvPbpKYK5nf2ZqvHPxbtF3gNn3Ei2v47u49+/XcBkYSMLfrGsE9GofZ nCMYrjCmVpb1RAMKL9Jp6hauEkEHzhFbA2C5+JR8ywcTI66nlItwAWMfXY0V1e3isl1G F0+oN6fZ3/peI3DgLg6iIYl6yw3VDJyWCTKoL6U2I/WKfgYfb5rjRQQjaJWlGjgmHy+5 XBBDzsFU9fQwuPxB1P1DWdrZf2n3GxOM7OSyF89pBXV6PT5UxrsYaU60wwrhpZbZDGYs 6OEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QmYHeON1gajVgJO6VXpRQddITJaBhiSChmfnR1sjfcI=; b=M4pppXl8AsGsEAqUtFRbZnfMXCawmlbY3rAyG/BCKxR79QrkKUsZ04oyGd1aQ1c0aG 54pQatwVdnkSqTm2Y7aRtO6U69NbX8dNZ5sJaxa2GFh6rG5s/z2dSX7n9D9jX71r8S9G l/t2SSKi27yZTckAkUle4fTsY2HdIljlQrXsL47UQQ4tHb+89MOHepFePFdfZiCLxF1S M9THLrNJ3lkLBgF+r0tDjcEYeQoGt7rBxzBbUtzdVDl1qzUCWyFaMF3zeFHQN8semjug nJI7+JJGFDl5aBHPZQDZVHmBzCghHuA6pGTKq+a//e6HL879YXCQhLWrkyoFs16DsyYU GqlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IJ9TX3BNTd/1QcWBu/WZoFVsdtBH6rZV03jIlblU9jIapnzMJ Niadt00J22KVxFwLp2tWougWU6cZQ7qx6vpbHbBKFiv7evo5taXEQS1FdEDpOkfduv71j4O/Z1o +4mZUfNlQl1IrRs4Hub7E
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:ac0b:b0:de:1944:ade2 with SMTP id kw11-20020a056870ac0b00b000de1944ade2mr8234049oab.159.1648208947354; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMU/cAgD7J6Q+9rL3EiQNZX5SCilu8BDipQ4+ITDii0xs4H08uZN77e+dVqkBMzUcNJn9YT4T5cB59KxVIeZk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:ac0b:b0:de:1944:ade2 with SMTP id kw11-20020a056870ac0b00b000de1944ade2mr8234044oab.159.1648208947047; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 04:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <042601d84029$1de567c0$59b03740$@olddog.co.uk> <c4e7e5c0-81a2-7f62-c81a-8f672eccd6db@joelhalpern.com> <DB9PR06MB7915CE12BC9DE1E9F62309E29E1A9@DB9PR06MB7915.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR06MB7915CE12BC9DE1E9F62309E29E1A9@DB9PR06MB7915.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:48:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAO8-O7pm7aznKmt--2Dfgtf=ZZ=o2xtjjRoLLOVMLpG6KP8_pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce004e05db098c12"
X-mailroute: internal
X-Proofpoint-GUID: VO4zHSjk_y8MKy0M5_dwW7YhxqqgtF11
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: VO4zHSjk_y8MKy0M5_dwW7YhxqqgtF11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xvZhm2eoH2fBABDw0TE8OPGT6QA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:49:15 -0000
+1 Regards, *Luay* On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:49 AM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO < luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Agree, the proposed change is ok. > > Best regards > > Luis > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> En nombre de Joel M. Halpern > Enviado el: viernes, 25 de marzo de 2022 10:30 > Para: teas@ietf.org > Asunto: Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service != Realization > > Works for me. > Yours, > Joel > > On 3/25/2022 5:17 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > First in a series of emails to resolve the open issues mentioned > > during the TEAS meeting. > > > > We have, for the longest time, suffered from a blurring between the > > service provided to the customer, and how that service is engineered in > the network. > > This leads us to talk about VPNs in a way where sometimes a VPN is > > what the customer gets and sometimes it is what the operator > > engineers. A good example is the term "MPLS VPN" as though the > > customer cares whether the VPN is provided using MPLS technology. > > > > We have, to some extent, clarifies this with recent YANG "Customer > > Service Models" that describe the service offered to the customer, but > > do not constrain the provider's choice of implementation technology or > options. > > > > As the discussion of IETF Network Slices continues, I have repeatedly > > seen some blurring between the topics of the "IETF Network Slice > > Service" and the "IETF Network Slice." It seems to me that this mixing > > of concepts will continue as future readers pick up the document. > > > > Although I have tried to use the two terms clearly and distinctly, the > > document is missing a clear statement to disambiguate the two. > > > > Section 3 provides the definitions of the two terms at some length > > using subsections. The clarification would get lost if it was placed > > at the bottom of the section after the subsections, so I propose to > > include some text near the top of section as follows. > > > > OLD > > IETF Network Slices are created to meet specific requirements, > > typically expressed as bandwidth, latency, latency variation, and > > other desired or required characteristics. Creation of an IETF > > Network Slice is initiated by a management system or other > > application used to specify network-related conditions for particular > > traffic flows in response to an actual or logical IETF Network Slice > > service request. > > > > Once created, these slices can be monitored, modified, deleted, and > > otherwise managed. > > > > Applications and components will be able to use these IETF Network > > Slices to move packets between the specified end-points of the > > service in accordance with specified characteristics. > > NEW > > IETF Network Slices are created to meet specific requirements, > > typically expressed as bandwidth, latency, latency variation, and > > other desired or required characteristics. Creation of an IETF > > Network Slice is initiated by a management system or other > > application used to specify network-related conditions for particular > > traffic flows in response to an actual or logical IETF Network Slice > > service request. > > > > Once created, these slices can be monitored, modified, deleted, and > > otherwise managed. > > > > Applications and components will be able to use these IETF Network > > Slices to move packets between the specified end-points of the > > service in accordance with specified characteristics. > > > > A clear distinction should be made between the "IETF Network > > Slice service" which is the function delivered to the customer > > (see Section 3.2) and which is agnostic to the technologies and > > Mechanisms used by the service provider, and the "IETF Network > > Slice" which is the realization of the service in the provider's > > network achieved by partitioning network resources and by > > applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see > > Section 3.1). > > END > > > > Any objections? > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Teas mailing list > > Teas@ietf.org > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= > > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, > divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su > destrucción. > > The information contained in this transmission is confidential and > privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, > pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou > cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=ZgpFwbYBRDMbGaCALx4Ex8KrMyZD-gVEhsHKWD9592QJ8dwgs8zvLN3YyhpE0lAq&s=PT9yEot5W1FaYvK-vS_Gc8_apuR_Azv2CkH7JBiNeUw&e= >
- [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Service … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Serv… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Serv… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Serv… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Jalil, Luay
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Kiran M
- Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Serv… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Slicing Framework Open issue #1 : Serv… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Slicing Framework Open issue #… Adrian Farrel