Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19

"Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com> Tue, 24 October 2023 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271E8C17C511; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AozhJ6HSwHDP; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2357C17C507; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SDy1L08tCz688J2; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:17:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) by lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:18:36 +0100
Received: from kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.104) by canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:18:34 +0800
Received: from kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.104]) by kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.104]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.023; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:18:34 +0800
From: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
Thread-Index: AdoCQCsddLxOQyjmRAGnLYdcCON1pQC8GjcAADzj2HA=
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:18:34 +0000
Message-ID: <afce4aa0bd644e72ac86b26dc2636653@huawei.com>
References: <f8a1c7632aca4c09808782639632664c@huawei.com> <CAB75xn4XcMn0u-fKb49V67uV8GJCUOX6dGwgq517LO-Sc9xKkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4XcMn0u-fKb49V67uV8GJCUOX6dGwgq517LO-Sc9xKkw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.114.167]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_afce4aa0bd644e72ac86b26dc2636653huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/dQ1jFQFpLerBT--S-wVqnDuGO3I>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:18:44 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

Thanks for addressing my comments.
I have one more question: Is there an explicit way to know the setting of VN type1 and VN type2? For example, “vn-type”? Or do these two types not need to be distinguished and can be switched in the realization?

Thanks,
Bo

From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 1:42 PM
To: Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
Cc: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19

Hi Bo,

Thanks for your review...

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 9:58 AM Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Hi all,

Sorry for the late reply. I support WGLC. I have reviewed the document and have a few minor editorial comments:
1. Figure 2 and 3: The basic components of the VN are AP/VNAP and vn-member. If the mapping between L1-L8 and AP/VNAP can be showed in Figure 2 and Figure 3, it is more clear to me to understand the relationship of VN and abstract node (AN).

Dhruv: Since these examples are focusing on single VN, I don't think there would be any added advantage.


2. YANG model: It is recommended that the “abstract-node“ under ”vn-ap” to add some description on what scenarios is needed, which seems redundant with ‘ltp’.

Dhruv: A reference to the abstract topology makes the correlation easier and it is not mandatory.


3. JSON Example: The text description of VN3 (Type 1) does not correspond to the JSON example. It seems to me:
OLD:
VN Member: 104 (L1 to L4)/107 (L1 to L7) {multi-dest}
VN Member: 204 (L2 to L4)/304 (L3 to L4) {multi-src}
NEW:
VN Member: 103 (L1 to L3)/107 (L1 to L7) {multi-dest}
VN Member: 108 (L1 to L8)/308 (L3 to L8) {multi-src}


Dhruv: I updated the text and JSON as well to reflect the example correctly. Thanks for spotting this!

Regards,
Dhruv


Thanks,
Bo

发件人: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>> 代表 Vishnu Pavan Beeram
发送时间: 2023年9月12日 20:19
收件人: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>
抄送: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
主题: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/

The working group last call ends on September 26th, 2023.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Note: IPR has been disclosed on this document

Thank you,
Pavan, Lou and Oscar
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas