Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 14 October 2023 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760CCC14CF1F; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 00:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqhYKf6QOcxh; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 00:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x936.google.com (mail-ua1-x936.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::936]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B8DC1519B1; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 00:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x936.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7b5fe8ab5f9so1162969241.3; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 00:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697268900; x=1697873700; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dp5OvSOeGMUtNI20OIArekB7NvFX47jtqdrrXVEkydY=; b=IZEs9ozrGsPQmewjIIgvn0JXUxIqQNcKLGRaEZKjTOihLQjeIyqYXpW7eyp2sVDBHz l0U0hQ639bI0t2G1Vt39y/UGLT6sXvRAwfrxJZrvDLyHks7QarQgO4AC3rXOZIJFa0Ix h8z26y/esuMBir8lXTtDC2OuUBfTyt5KeXgiFkunQwrKwR1mmkyOw0MsuAE7s1nhyV8M 0OQmlYCJfG/wYFYs5jy+7OaPt77rYrBe4XsVtjHiEV+IOf5tC9rc2lK3Zzl9J0mq63R5 VkXby4rfwVCcVxeDyRU/3ZhbQ6koPbs2+u6rXeECXV3mE2K5BiPsCPWTcDmfTS+6kdLa FOdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697268900; x=1697873700; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Dp5OvSOeGMUtNI20OIArekB7NvFX47jtqdrrXVEkydY=; b=Gpgvc1Nr5I6haWwqAYjWkYLhBfRFycz+gBzW8s9zfpjtUyydcL+MezF8GpZu4HI9Mv 9lNKw4pHqprZv1c3aX5K/ng58g8DInQ/im3dOQI/t/QZEum7Ly4iTTRvF4SRe9+Sp/dt e9z3PBCzydijfwOm9oKZe5JgGYbPYwfTdDfHzful+70BcTYK0qHizGVBMpvtQ9KhqGUn wmfD4Z9y+T+RR4qRQcVXv5cg/iER9rNQ47Pqf0pm5b7xanw8WIwOixcmsZ3c6l1s21EF zbz5/hATUCfMnm+A6sXAgNC52W5UVjR3JhVp4pEA1oG4ZP25FdcHKVEdcWOdB2vZamBD /dMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxghnT/x6OscR66P9YfDkk+ecRetVSUm2r5sx7T5J5xoQfadNwr flJ3D/u8JxU0gHFMu5vcxSaRQGmT5u33a5itHhE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMFkAa1640ka32nXoAUe2pKvnj13l+M4t5NG+hBHKNNv7UXyb43PDfqtJfzSXpodpdv3UAiw0UkbEcGvcONbU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3016:b0:452:bf74:bcec with SMTP id s22-20020a056102301600b00452bf74bcecmr26943453vsa.10.1697268899932; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTvKRaj0mc-Uu_PR=a3f3FdQm8i4iWDVs-ngEgDz1JWYYA@mail.gmail.com> <048d01d9f24a$f3f67fa0$dbe37ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <048d01d9f24a$f3f67fa0$dbe37ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:04:23 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5o_b0iaf_q0TWSVow3L2Dcnpk9rc-B8u8x92F51icYjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000de72800607a8354c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/p052j4FB3fQn8d_LQCuOZawUDvQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:35:03 -0000

Hi Adrian, WG,

Thanks for your comments. They are very useful...

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:03 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I support this work and think that it is almost ready to move forward.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> ===
>
>
>
> It is a bit odd that the filename mentions ACTN, and the document is
>
> quite strong on ACTN, but the Title and Abstract don't mention it at
>
> all, and the term doesn't show up until well into the Introduction.
>
>
>

Dhruv: I have added "This includes VN operations as per Abstraction and
Control of TE Networks (ACTN) framework." in the abstract. I have also
moved the ACTN sentence in the Introduction higher up.



> ---
>
>
>
> I would like the authors to add some more clarity early in the document
>
> about how the VN is represented in abstract terms to the customer. That
>
> is, it is presented as a connectivity matrix rather than as a network?
>
> I feel this is an important distinction in the field of virtual networks
>
> (consider the distinction between providing an L3VPN service and giving
>
> a customer access to a virtual subset of the underlay network resources
>
> that they can operate as if it was their own physical network). So, the
>
> distinction is about whether the virtual network is presented to the
>
> customer simply as edge connectivity or as a full network.
>
>
>

Dhruv: Following text is added:

   As per [RFC8795], a TE node connectivity matrix is the TE node's
   switching limitations in the form of valid switching combinations of
   the TE node's LTPs and potential TE paths.  The VN representation
   relies on a single abstract TE node with a connectivity matrix.  The
   VN can be abstracted as a set of edge-to-edge links (a Type 1 VN).
   Each link is the VN member that is mapped to the connectivity matrix
   entry (Section 2.1).  The VN can also be abstracted as a topology of
   virtual nodes and virtual links (a Type 2 VN).  Alongside the mapping
   of VN members to connectivity matrix entry, an underlay path can also
   be specified (Section 2.2).


Hope this clarifies it.

---
>
>
>
> There seems to be material in 2.1 and 2.2 repeated in 3.1 and 3.2. Is
>
> that necessary?
>
>
>

Dhruv: Removed.



> ---
>
>
>
> The description of the Type 1 VN in Sections 2.1 and 3.1 bothers me. It
>
> is true that you can represent this model as an abstract, but in general
>
> it is not wise. Well, unless you talk about "limited cross-connect
>
> capabilities."
>
>
>
> The example in this section presents a VN with 6 customer end-points and
>
> 4 abstract links (VN members). But, of course, when you represent this
>
> as an abstract node, there are 15 possible cross-connects and no way of
>
> knowing which ones don't apply.
>
>
>
> So I would strongly advise you stick with the "VN members"
>
> representation of abstract links, and not venture into the abstract node
>
> way of modeling it.
>
>
>
>
>

Dhruv: The abstract node is key to the YANG model for both VN type 1 and 2.
The connectivity matrix is how you limit the possibilities. I have added
dotted lines to show the VN-members in the figure 2 instead.


> ===
>
>
>
> There are a few trivial nits you could clean up at the same time.
>
>
>

Dhruv: These are fixed.

I have posted an update -

Name:     draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang
> Revision: 20
> Title:    A YANG Data Model for Virtual Network (VN) Operations
> Date:     2023-10-14
> Group:    teas
> Pages:    50
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-20.txt
> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/
> HTML:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-20.html
> HTMLized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang
> Diff:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-20



I also wanted to formally note my support for publication as a co-author.

Thanks!
Dhruv



> 1.
>
>
>
>    such as Layer Three Virtual Private Network Service Model
>
>    (L3SM) [RFC8299], Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model
>
>    (L2SM) [RFC8466] and Layer One Connectivity Service Model (L1CSM)
>
>    [I-D.ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang]
>
>
>
> Insert definite articles ("the") before each "Layer".
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> 1.
>
>
>
>    The actual VN instantiation and computation is performed with
>
>    Connectivity Matrices sub-module of TE-Topology Model [RFC8795] which
>
>    provides TE network topology abstraction and management operation.
>
>    Once TE-topology Model is used in triggering VN instantiation over
>
>    the networks, TE-tunnel [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] Model will inevitably
>
>    interact with TE-Topology model for setting up actual tunnels and
>
>    LSPs under the tunnels.
>
>
>
> Insert definite article before each "TE-".
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> 1.
>
>
>
>    The YANG model on the CMI is also known as customer service model in
>
>    [RFC8309].
>
>
>
> s/as/as the/
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> 1.2.  Tree diagram
>
>
>
> s/diagram/Diagram/
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> 2.
>
>
>
> The text should probably make reference to the figure.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> There is a line length problem near the bottom of page 41
>
>
>
> *From:* Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Vishnu Pavan Beeram
> *Sent:* 12 September 2023 13:19
> *To:* TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
>
>
>
> All,
>
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/
>
>
>
> The working group last call ends on September 26th, 2023.
>
> Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>
> Note: IPR has been disclosed on this document
>
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan, Lou and Oscar
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>