Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Sun, 22 October 2023 22:41 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACF5C15155B; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_hASePvOZU4; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE20C14CE52; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SDCrW3nXRz67n5j; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:37:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:41:21 +0200
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.031; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:41:21 +0200
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "Sergio Belotti (Nokia)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "dhruv.ietf@gmail.com" <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
Thread-Index: AQHaAnUxXEUNnRN9k0mlQ/EMWxIEqbBWY2DA
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 22:41:21 +0000
Message-ID: <4e2d47d0281544b1bd09651fba77c13c@huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvKRaj0mc-Uu_PR=a3f3FdQm8i4iWDVs-ngEgDz1JWYYA@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR07MB54905E4FFA0D92FEAD94989491D7A@AM0PR07MB5490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB5546035A65E303BD6EEB6B7DA2D7A@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB10160C7A9F099726D6F37BD8888D6A@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB5546B2FC6D254F497F0ED909A2D5A@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB10160B97524C1605C7D4946EF88D5A@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB5546FB1A949C9A7EE0A7BD58A2D4A@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5546FB1A949C9A7EE0A7BD58A2D4A@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.144.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xN1G7XaKWHmwt_tb6gkfqt7Fog0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 22:41:28 -0000
Tom, Med, I have few comments about this discussion The node-id is mandatory since it is the key for the node list as defined in RFC8345 The te-node-id is also mandatory when the te presence container is present under the node as specified in the must statement in RFC8795 In past discussions I have been told that a dotted-quad string is a valid URI so the node-id can be set equal to the te-node-id but it does not have to (that's why in some case node-id is set to 'D1' and in other cases is set as a dotted-quad values equal to te-node-id) However, I have not been able to find any definitive answer (e.g., an on-line validation tool) that confirms or contradicts that a dotted-quad string is a valid URI: do you know some reference? Last comment: in other documents, I have got the comment that we need to use values in the reserved range defined in RFC5737 also for the dotted-quad identifiers used in the examples My 2 cents Italo > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> > Sent: giovedì 19 ottobre 2023 12:15 > To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Sergio Belotti (Nokia) > <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram > <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> > Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; dhruv.ietf@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19 > > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > Sent: 18 October 2023 09:47 > > Hi Tom, > > > But is node-id the correct leaf? > > It is correct as the parent is "ietf-network:networks". te-specific data nodes > are prefixed with "ietf-te-topology" (e.g., "ietf-te-topology:te-node-id"). > > <tp> > I disagree. 'node-id' does not appear anywhere else in the I-D and 'te-node- > id' does and the example used to contain 'te-node-id' so while the YANG > heirarchy may be correct for 'node-id', I suspect that authors have the > wrong leaf and so the wrond YANG heirarchy. > > Tools will not detect such an error if error it is. > > Tom Petch > > > Anyway, I recommend the authors to run yangson against all the examples > (in addition to fixing all the uri entries as per the erratum I shared earlier). > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> > > Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2023 10:29 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed > > INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Sergio Belotti (Nokia) > > <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram > > <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> Cc : TEAS WG Chairs > > <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; dhruv.ietf@gmail.com Objet : Re: [Teas] WG > > Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19 > > > > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> > > Sent: 17 October 2023 12:45 > > > > Hi Tom, all, > > > > > "node-id": "192.0.2.1", > > > > Changing to "example:192.0.2.1" would make it a valid URI. > > > > The same fix applies to many similar data nodes in Section 7. > > > > BTW, please note that even the examples in RFC8345 with data nodes of > > type uri are wrong (see for example > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > > rfc- > > > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6900&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair% > 40orang > > > e.com%7C6b4f6e40f41c4dcf214e08dbcfb453bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b > 9253b6 > > > f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638332145624887074%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > 8eyJWIjoiMC4 > > > wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7 > C%7C%7 > > > C&sdata=iCVk8eJKCSdtxNdAlsTZE4oLt3yH%2FhjocyofkCl1zDA%3D&reserved > =0). > > > > <tp> > > > > But is node-id the correct leaf? > > > > A few years ago, the example had both node-id and te-node-id leaves, > > the former with a value of 'D1', the latter with a value of '2.0.1.1' > > > > I note that everywhere else in the I-D there are references to te- > > node-id and none to node-id. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > De : Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de tom petch Envoyé : > > > lundi 16 octobre 2023 13:11 À : Sergio Belotti (Nokia) > > > <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram > > > <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> Cc : TEAS WG > Chairs > > > <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; dhruv.ietf@gmail.com Objet : Re: [Teas] WG > > > Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19 > > > > > > Picking a related e-mail to tack my comment onto > > > > > > From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Sergio Belotti > > (Nokia) > > > <sergio.belotti@nokia.com> > > > Sent: 16 October 2023 10:00 > > > > > > Hi Pavan, WG, > > > > > > I support this work (as contributor) and think that it is ready to > > > move forward as soon as Adrian's comments have been successfully > > > addressed. > > > > > > <tp> > > > I am confused. Looking at the example in e.g. 7.2 I see > > > > > > { > > > "ietf-network:networks": { > > > "network": [ > > > { > > > .... > > > }, > > > "node": [ > > > { > > > "node-id": "192.0.2.1", > > > If this is the node-id of RFC8345 then that is of type node-id which > > > is a URI. I am not used to seeing URI in this format. > > > > > > If I search the rest of the I-D, I do not see node-id. Rather s.3.1 > > > has te-node-id which is a different YANG type. > > > > > > This confuses me. > > > > > > I do have some more, more editorial, comments but am stuck on this > > > one. > > > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sergio (as contributor) > > > > > > > > > From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:19 PM > > > To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> > > > Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org> > > > Subject: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19 > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when > > > clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for > > > additional information. > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > This starts a two-week working group last call on > > > > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata > > > > > %2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C6b4f6e4 > 0f41c4dcf21 > > > > > > 4e08dbcfb453bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63 > 83321456 > > > > > > 24887074%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi > V2luMzIiL > > > > > > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Uidlg8ivXIt > 48ATDJj > > > lcbpOEgrqXu4iV9cTA%2FYMq8jY%3D&reserved=0 > > > tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-teas-actn-vn- > > > > > > yang%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cd37cf > deb47e743 > > > > > > 9fcc4b08dbce3893db%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0 > %7C638330 > > > > > > 514615737399%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC > JQIjoiV2luM > > > > > > zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=isc5aJp9 > gX5UlZ > > > CweI%2BYW3B4k5YTFHvzXItnxfREEB4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > The working group last call ends on September 26th, 2023. > > > Please send your comments to the working group mailing list. > > > > > > Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it > > > is ready for publication", are welcome! > > > This is useful and important, even from authors. > > > > > > Note: IPR has been disclosed on this document > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Pavan, Lou and Oscar > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Teas mailing list > > > Teas@ietf.org > > > > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww% > > > 2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C6b4f6e40f4 > 1c4dcf214 > > > e08dbcfb453bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638 > 33214562 > > > 4887074%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV > 2luMzIiLC > > > JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EyREJi%2Be > wo3aUl8ym > > 6kdDAVy%2BsHNgH4Glm2qgnFOnEY%3D&reserved=0. > > > > > > ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.bouc > adair% > > > > > > 40orange.com%7Cd37cfdeb47e7439fcc4b08dbce3893db%7C90c7a20af34b4 > 0bfbc48 > > > > > > b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638330514615737399%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJW > > > > > > IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C > 3000% > > > > > > 7C%7C%7C&sdata=9YMjzkWS1RrsNOCwO9ZkH%2BFVgoP65xUM0lkE4%2Bb > VzuU%3D&rese > > > rved=0 > > > ________________________________________________________________ > ______ > > ______________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, > > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message > > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi > > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles > > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete > > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not > > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > > delete this message and its attachments. > > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have > > been modified, changed or falsified. > > Thank you. > > ________________________________________________________________ > ____________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites > ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez > le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les > messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute > responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, > used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
- [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Ogaki, Kenichi
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Sergio Belotti (Nokia)
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Italo Busi
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-… Wubo (lana)