IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Mon, 04 November 2024 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAFDC1D5301 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:36:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_JpkpUPufe8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A27C1CAE6D for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539f0f9ee49so4875799e87.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 07:36:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1730734561; x=1731339361; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gGa/Vn7MRCX6ljuJW91ROtpAXNUsDACuP+WVZnrEMo4=; b=zXPgvr8U500wIY9lsK75mMwAiW3Ow3JOKE1B4JdpZVlCzrd20FHKqxsYJw3Z0G0Ykg WRMwBVRK78wXgt2UEjIADgrBWp9DRUgOl1bsWQlcm16rGObzZ/CYqHXUVlMnRBi5LS0Z 4F9JQGOsynqtna1DmvTHlgaT3BVcRY0sSjgZSPS94Ar6ogN8HxbfZcQFhbpLo0lZ805H ASIBbcs6j9AX2Tl8+Z653NB2CYNY2zj8deYxBGMINtWBWmWRZusRVhBKT2b9oGfWmEZV nFS0q5gVztyAE562nChtYvCacX1wGXX0slVS5ieCnkP7nluXJEwPel0u0vaCmTiXAey5 K1ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730734561; x=1731339361; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=gGa/Vn7MRCX6ljuJW91ROtpAXNUsDACuP+WVZnrEMo4=; b=t7Nllliv7TlL5itZeWZV+ujq117A3LVIoNAdh5R74LWs/xLaSW9XMlJVW0mP3RqURr 1sdpMcSVLHv+kbGwK+/KrWgW0v1CWIdQJu4/JZTUXBMPXxHeKgwO2/bAxstPwCDnI8uV NoVgXLzkTeF9Xd27YwCDGSvQkUuFRehiUhHLwUmx1xDJSBIFLPV/hkmB/UtS+wmevxjp W9eRI20OWpBmMe8B/6uqYVMxL8Vi6YStdHS08DmPLsGCSigpeGYHV2Wpf2YE5T1cccuR L23+IyTsxA4/Tn4ZfjanEx/o/Jae7zOx8ppSC3hw0eXuRIDzfKIGGRWfP7tn6o5JeFkd c5Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwCn9jON3kDLpYqsR4gvLzsaRGgsN90dYzhMdH4D3sYNa4DIj/y GSu2eTbVRP6UG6pBbdafYT1SyIdP/b22hL2Ejb7k8bnW/hHvN8PWw0L55GIxwBjCRp78iyPzawH nxZkIpMMHp5LWvjmkup/Rtkv2NykzSwS4V4qBghOIjxpGUbiofPfyLCMD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEo3UyaeFjZwJ/3N22jD/HHEhHrKCK+p+n1gljmSJsSSWIo9Wj6kvt21R/4rk00k1JnDtpCsDRce53Kf7yV7ek=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8c3:0:b0:2fb:382e:410f with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fcbdfdb11cmr153641561fa.26.1730734560905; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 07:36:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZxukyqH6-ctzWwRg@chardros.imrryr.org> <49D64B5F-165D-46C8-B98F-ADDCC639D709@salowey.net> <13F68CDB-E4B6-4E3B-B28D-7A930C8B7BBF@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <13F68CDB-E4B6-4E3B-B28D-7A930C8B7BBF@akamai.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 15:35:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoDmBoPQ3aha+=pQfq8es+uxyU1=MeYEgyk1pSw3Xm7XYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b42d850626180aeb"
Message-ID-Hash: DCU2NDXZFXOHFFDCBSXTHQPRMBDIC5JK
X-Message-ID-Hash: DCU2NDXZFXOHFFDCBSXTHQPRMBDIC5JK
X-MailFrom: joe@salowey.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/iy6Dz9GNYuurX6U_Yk4-4vx8onY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:48 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> > While there is overlap between professional behavior and the perceived
> focus on browser specific use cases; I think we should try to separate out
> the topic.
>
> My memory, perhaps faulty, is that "will browsers implement this" has been
> a process-gating question in the past. Recognizing that not everything the
> WG will do is useful or applicable to all participants is, I think, a
> useful reminder for, well, all participants.
>
> Yes. I think we can do that as a separate reminder

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status