IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 30 May 2023 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7782BC136123 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnwomJFPCpOx for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7E3C15E406 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.16.173]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168651F45B; Tue, 30 May 2023 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A1AA2A6362; Tue, 30 May 2023 18:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F284A635A; Tue, 30 May 2023 12:35:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <d006bf06-b71f-263f-038a-08e25b6ba059@amsl.com>
References: <20230530153830.6ED61E1E00F2@ary.qy> <d006bf06-b71f-263f-038a-08e25b6ba059@amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> message dated "Tue, 30 May 2023 11:02:46 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3430203.1685464516.1@dyas>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 12:35:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3430204.1685464516@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/-xLn278DxyLHtIVjA3hOzUlazOw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:35:54 -0000

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote:
    >> Any idea how many spam reports there were?  With 80% of the non-spam
    >> verified it doesn't seem like the real reports are a problem.

    > [JM] In 2022, 24% of the errata reports were junk. Note that CAPTCHA
    > was rolled out in April 2022. So in the 3 months before the CAPTCHA
    > rollout, 36% reports were junk; afterward, 19% were junk.

So lots of junk reports solved the CAPTCHA?
When will the new system be started/finished?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email