IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Tue, 30 May 2023 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260A5C151990 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgHNrkQD76rj for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB55C1516EB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1CE4250004; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mun3eUOg5LXM; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0AEA4250003; Tue, 30 May 2023 09:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d006bf06-b71f-263f-038a-08e25b6ba059@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:02:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20230530153830.6ED61E1E00F2@ary.qy>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230530153830.6ED61E1E00F2@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/IhBcHcjKlzITRYRmtA0mzLiC-nk>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:02:56 -0000


On 5/30/23 10:38 AM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Jean Mahoney  <jmahoney@amsl.com> said:
>> [JM] Of the non-spam errata reports that were processed in 2022 (179
>> reports, including both technical and editorial), 80% were Verified, 7%
>> were Held for Document Update, and 12% were Rejected. See [1] for
>> definitions.
> Any idea how many spam reports there were?  With 80% of the non-spam
> verified it doesn't seem like the real reports are a problem.
[JM] In 2022, 24% of the errata reports were junk. Note that CAPTCHA was 
rolled out in April 2022. So in the 3 months before the CAPTCHA rollout, 
36% reports were junk; afterward, 19% were junk.

Best regards,
Jean

>
> R's,
> John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email