Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Tue, 30 May 2023 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B774AC15199D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WW1hwWTiZwvF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CF8C14CEFE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830164250009; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLpTbMxZ5qeR; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49D29424CD38; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <427da6b1-fdfe-b848-a3c7-b62fa193e98e@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 13:56:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20230530153830.6ED61E1E00F2@ary.qy> <d006bf06-b71f-263f-038a-08e25b6ba059@amsl.com> <3430204.1685464516@dyas>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <3430204.1685464516@dyas>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/1RCB-gszQPxvhtIXJvolOSD-NHE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:56:36 -0000

Hi Michael,

On 5/30/23 11:35 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote:
>      >> Any idea how many spam reports there were?  With 80% of the non-spam
>      >> verified it doesn't seem like the real reports are a problem.
>
>      > [JM] In 2022, 24% of the errata reports were junk. Note that CAPTCHA
>      > was rolled out in April 2022. So in the 3 months before the CAPTCHA
>      > rollout, 36% reports were junk; afterward, 19% were junk.
>
> So lots of junk reports solved the CAPTCHA?
[JM] Humans can solve CAPTCHAs. When we see several junk reports from 
the same address, we block that address.

> When will the new system be started/finished?
>
[JM] The RPC is still in the requirements phase. The rough estimate is 
that we will have something later this year. We are working on queue and 
workflow management first.

Best regards,
Jean