IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B521AD0BC; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTtRO-MpOo0f; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDAD1AD0B1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oblw8 with SMTP id w8so9352401obl.0; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wK6mIW1hakEG2kXXNJ4j0z7wgcARGQci1Mi0tPyp4Hc=; b=IHZPtTs6DPH+S1glsLmzI8X/NlOSXt++6q19K0AKlSpeYrIgh9hqu79HxCPyfvxt1n GQaN46j9DRQoWlp0w6OfaKe8eLJ4x5mD0LaV+xW7vt/Taq40xoOPeDdm5x0qRZWADtcw JrPELSKi2IXiWChoUrZK4SB57a+scpSkIrNBKoFPkDmgyWxmW/urCiRfyCj92IYWrQm2 AiruPxo20sI+ejB4RONtBZT4Tul4/gJj55lPaHIqriVe+NPiHS4PhxO3dhlzX6jSnjlw C47ihqgbFvG6Ioq1hn9TiloWFyoAwtu9EHKIN/TO/dbmBV6vwpGuu+4y+c73C3bUiKQt pUXw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.39.195 with SMTP id r3mr17866494obk.44.1429042708556; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.212.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALDtMrK+95BhTpSQh7s1TYWp6RBqYTP93n82tmQE0tcB-TJuuw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150410193813.20376.40907.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55282B4E.4000409@akamai.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A411FFC5F@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CABkgnnUyHTd83LWM0Lp0xOJnVp3Gt6KvrbuGkraejP7kwEJf7w@mail.gmail.com> <CALDtMrLO-kqM4LTOgKJq90swE52k0draQ110t5Q8GVfUwPFpUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXM0oZs1Za9v5eAGAnNwioQDxHBu9GCP5K04XO9BN6YtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALDtMrK+95BhTpSQh7s1TYWp6RBqYTP93n82tmQE0tcB-TJuuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU86fdJVGJLPjLScXCwng4QVcPdgN+3ALoyTYuM2TcNAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/YIR4ADhWtGlWFmrRqQsv5PwHSak>
Cc: "tram-chairs@ietf.org" <tram-chairs@ietf.org>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>, Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>, "rlb@ipv.sx" <rlb@ipv.sx>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, "Stephen Farrell (stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie)" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [tram] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:18:30 -0000

On 14 April 2015 at 12:53, Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> wrote:
> It requires some time to sink in, I admit. But after some time, you
> will see that it correctly describes the procedures needed to get a
> third-party authorization for the STUN operations. I agree that this
> is not an easiest of the readings.


A document that requires multiple readings and repeated admonishments
of "give it more time" is not fit for publication.

> You can set the server name to
"Martin Thomson" and it will be perfectly OK.

OK, you still haven't explained why such a field needs to be defined
in an RFC.  Ideally, the draft should contain that explanation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email