IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)

Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Tue, 29 July 2008 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCC63A6B90; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0463A6B8B for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rp9MMp24SrQk for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586493A676A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693E198DE5; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6E3198DDE; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.187.12.123] (win3123.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.12.123]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D8CA0657; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <488F2C90.6080508@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:43:28 +0200
From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Organization: University of Wuerzburg
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <XFE-SJC-211H71yEXUI00005a5b@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com> <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CC0C5@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <7AF89273-3852-4CD5-9DA4-33A1BDAD0FD7@g11.org.uk> <XFE-SJC-212VGiSu5C500005d9e@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-212VGiSu5C500005d9e@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

yes, tunneling is a big issue that makes life hard for PCN. This 
clarifying work is needed.

Regards,

    Michael

James M. Polk wrote:
> At 02:58 AM 7/29/2008, ken carlberg wrote:
>> if I heard correctly, it was agreed (mumbled :-) to take the
>> discussion onto the list
>
> this is correct, mostly because not enough folks admitted they had 
> read it (by not raising their hands when asked "who read this ID") to 
> give an informed opinion one way or the other.
>
> I will clarify this in the notes
>
> that said, do folks feel strongly that this ID should be a TSVWG item?
>
> James
> TSVWG co-chair
>
>
>> -ken
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>>
>>> I read the section on Bob's draft (draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-01)
>>> but it was not clear to me either in the meeting (hard to hear mid-way
>>> back) or in the notes whether the WG decided to proceed with the I-D
>>> as
>>> a WG item.
>>>
>>> My two cents on the issue is that it seems like a worthwhile I-D for
>>> the
>>> WG.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of James M. Polk
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:32 PM
>>>> To: tsvwg
>>>> Subject: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
>>>>
>>>> Please comment about accuracy
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/tsvwg.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> James
>>>> IETF TSVWG co-chair
>>>>
>>>>              ***********************************
>>>>     "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing"
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science
Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
phone: (+49)-931/888-6644, fax: (+49)-931/888-6632
mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email