IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 29 July 2008 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B0528C171; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8DE3A6B41 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZx6lI2OqDLW for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0B63A6AB7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,272,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="58885705"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2008 12:44:04 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6TCi4VE021674; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:44:04 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6TCi4WY003060; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:44:04 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:44:03 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.21.149.41]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:44:03 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:43:58 -0500
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AF89273-3852-4CD5-9DA4-33A1BDAD0FD7@g11.org.uk>
References: <XFE-SJC-211H71yEXUI00005a5b@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com> <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CC0C5@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <7AF89273-3852-4CD5-9DA4-33A1BDAD0FD7@g11.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212VGiSu5C500005d9e@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2008 12:44:03.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7FD3990:01C8F178]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1419; t=1217335444; x=1218199444; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Tsvwg]=20DRAFT=20Minutes=20from=20TSVW G=20Dublin=20(IETF72) |Sender:=20; bh=Db7kXXzxUg2EybATTgftqAMT+EP1EX4gIb/2YporhoY=; b=odw9IU5iHXp4ncrXRqVVBDaMLD6evR5f0cDvcGqgUmPKq5DRiMsL2QCgSe BKZb3WAAm+/F0/TZK7Qrj8eN0qf5X3qYZqnNcgLjVCpJi6WNbJQsMQO48ULH gl4qxdQAHxmefhMaCa49w8Ad+aSJ3OhgBO+c7ua7/ikCniYjkBU1Y=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

At 02:58 AM 7/29/2008, ken carlberg wrote:
>if I heard correctly, it was agreed (mumbled :-) to take the
>discussion onto the list

this is correct, mostly because not enough folks admitted they had 
read it (by not raising their hands when asked "who read this ID") to 
give an informed opinion one way or the other.

I will clarify this in the notes

that said, do folks feel strongly that this ID should be a TSVWG item?

James
TSVWG co-chair


>-ken
>
>
>On Jul 28, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>
>>I read the section on Bob's draft (draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-01)
>>but it was not clear to me either in the meeting (hard to hear mid-way
>>back) or in the notes whether the WG decided to proceed with the I-D
>>as
>>a WG item.
>>
>>My two cents on the issue is that it seems like a worthwhile I-D for
>>the
>>WG.
>>
>>Jason
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org]
>>>On Behalf Of James M. Polk
>>>Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:32 PM
>>>To: tsvwg
>>>Subject: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
>>>
>>>Please comment about accuracy
>>>
>>>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/tsvwg.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>James
>>>IETF TSVWG co-chair
>>>
>>>              ***********************************
>>>     "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing"
>>>
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email