Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)

ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk> Tue, 29 July 2008 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F8D3A6AF5; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472DD3A6AF4 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jZPWgO-6rf6x for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from portland.eukhost.com (portland.eukhost.com [92.48.97.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119763A69B9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c-68-33-242-58.hsd1.md.comcast.net ([68.33.242.58]:38457 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by portland.eukhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlberg@g11.org.uk>) id 1KNk60-0005xE-CI; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:58:12 +0000
Message-Id: <7AF89273-3852-4CD5-9DA4-33A1BDAD0FD7@g11.org.uk>
From: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CC0C5@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:58:12 -0400
References: <XFE-SJC-211H71yEXUI00005a5b@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com> <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CC0C5@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - portland.eukhost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - g11.org.uk
Cc: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

if I heard correctly, it was agreed (mumbled :-) to take the  
discussion onto the list

-ken


On Jul 28, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote:

> I read the section on Bob's draft (draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-01)
> but it was not clear to me either in the meeting (hard to hear mid-way
> back) or in the notes whether the WG decided to proceed with the I-D  
> as
> a WG item.
>
> My two cents on the issue is that it seems like a worthwhile I-D for  
> the
> WG.
>
> Jason
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org]
>> On Behalf Of James M. Polk
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:32 PM
>> To: tsvwg
>> Subject: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
>>
>> Please comment about accuracy
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/tsvwg.txt
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> James
>> IETF TSVWG co-chair
>>
>>              ***********************************
>>     "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing"
>>
>>
>>