IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Mon, 28 July 2008 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED203A6A82; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB2B3A6B37 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-rvq8RucbFk for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6C73A6A82 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.195.246.152]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.9449781; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:54:02 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by NJMDCEXCRLY01.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:54:01 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:52:08 -0400
Message-ID: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CC0C5@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-211H71yEXUI00005a5b@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
Thread-Index: Acjw0Cu6VJTTeqq2TJqrGNJjzC5D2QAMlRug
References: <XFE-SJC-211H71yEXUI00005a5b@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2008 22:54:01.0933 (UTC) FILETIME=[D40527D0:01C8F104]
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

I read the section on Bob's draft (draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-01)
but it was not clear to me either in the meeting (hard to hear mid-way
back) or in the notes whether the WG decided to proceed with the I-D as
a WG item.  

My two cents on the issue is that it seems like a worthwhile I-D for the
WG.

Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of James M. Polk
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:32 PM
> To: tsvwg
> Subject: [Tsvwg] DRAFT Minutes from TSVWG Dublin (IETF72)
> 
> Please comment about accuracy
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/tsvwg.txt
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> James
> IETF TSVWG co-chair
> 
>               ***********************************
>      "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing"
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email