Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

[Bruce Davie <[e-mail]>]

On Jun 20, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

> The authors of "IntServ Extension to Allow Signaling of Multiple Traffic Specifications and Multiple Flow Specifications in RSVPv1" (draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec) requests that this is adopted as WG item.
> 
>   This draft defines extensions to Integrated Services (IntServ)
>   allowing  multiple traffic specifications and multiple flow
>   specifications to be conveyed in the same Resource Reservation
>   Protocol (RSVPv1) reservation message exchange. This ability helps
>   optimize an agreeable bandwidth through a network between endpoints
>   in a single round trip
> 
> There was hum indicating general WG support for this at the last IETF in Prague. I applied to the AD to amend our Charter to allow this work, which was approved. So we are now ready to make a formal decision and this email is to allow people to confirm that there is sufficient energy to complete this work in TSVWG.
> 
> 
> * PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.

Good idea (I'm sure my view will come as a shock)

> 
> * Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document during its development - our AD has indicated that we expect to have at least 4 people who commit to review this within the WG, perform a detailed review in WGLC and provide appropriate comments if called upon during the IESG review. If you can promise to do this please say!
> 

I will provide (another) review.

Bruce