Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Mon, 20 June 2011 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD28B1F0C5B for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fJl3oVTkbdT for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08151F0C59 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0E585C174BE; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:54:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06
In-Reply-To: <4DFF058D.1010309@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <20110620165434.0E585C174BE@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:54:34 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:54:36 -0000

> * PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document 
> in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.

I think it is a good (long delayed) idea

> * Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document 
> during its development 

I am

Scott