Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

[Francois Le Faucheur <[e-mail]>]

Hello Gorry,

It is a good idea.
As you know I already provided comments on this doc, but I will review it again during its development. In fact, it is on my ToDo list before Quebec City meeting.

Thanks

Francois

On 20 Jun 2011, at 10:32, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

> The authors of "IntServ Extension to Allow Signaling of Multiple Traffic Specifications and Multiple Flow Specifications in RSVPv1" (draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec) requests that this is adopted as WG item.
> 
>   This draft defines extensions to Integrated Services (IntServ)
>   allowing  multiple traffic specifications and multiple flow
>   specifications to be conveyed in the same Resource Reservation
>   Protocol (RSVPv1) reservation message exchange. This ability helps
>   optimize an agreeable bandwidth through a network between endpoints
>   in a single round trip
> 
> There was hum indicating general WG support for this at the last IETF in Prague. I applied to the AD to amend our Charter to allow this work, which was approved. So we are now ready to make a formal decision and this email is to allow people to confirm that there is sufficient energy to complete this work in TSVWG.
> 
> 
> * PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.
> 
> * Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document during its development - our AD has indicated that we expect to have at least 4 people who commit to review this within the WG, perform a detailed review in WGLC and provide appropriate comments if called upon during the IESG review. If you can promise to do this please say!
> 
> 
> Please provide any comments at the latest by Wednesday 29th June 2011.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Gorry Fairhurst
> (TSVWG Co-Chair)
> 
>