Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

["Mcdysan, David E" <[e-mail]>]

On Monday6/20/11 4:32 AM, "Gorry Fairhurst" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>The authors of "IntServ Extension to Allow Signaling of Multiple Traffic
>Specifications and Multiple Flow Specifications in RSVPv1"
>(draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec) requests that this is adopted
>as WG item.
>
>    This draft defines extensions to Integrated Services (IntServ)
>    allowing  multiple traffic specifications and multiple flow
>    specifications to be conveyed in the same Resource Reservation
>    Protocol (RSVPv1) reservation message exchange. This ability helps
>    optimize an agreeable bandwidth through a network between endpoints
>    in a single round trip
>
>There was hum indicating general WG support for this at the last IETF in
>Prague. I applied to the AD to amend our Charter to allow this work,
>which was approved. So we are now ready to make a formal decision and
>this email is to allow people to confirm that there is sufficient energy
>to complete this work in TSVWG.

I think this is a good idea. It is a potential solution to some
requirements for composite links soon to be published by the rtgwg. These
extensions could be used in RSVP-TE to meet these requirements.

>
>
>* PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document
>in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.
>
>* Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document
>during its development - our AD has indicated that we expect to have at
>least 4 people who commit to review this within the WG, perform a
>detailed review in WGLC and provide appropriate comments if called upon
>during the IESG review. If you can promise to do this please say!

I can be a reviewer.
>
>
>Please provide any comments at the latest by Wednesday 29th June 2011.
>
>
>Best regards
>
>Gorry Fairhurst
>(TSVWG Co-Chair)
>
>