Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Gorry,
	See below.

On 6/20/2011 4:32 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
> The authors of "IntServ Extension to Allow Signaling of Multiple Traffic 
> Specifications and Multiple Flow Specifications in RSVPv1" 
> (draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec) requests that this is adopted 
> as WG item.
> 
>     This draft defines extensions to Integrated Services (IntServ)
>     allowing  multiple traffic specifications and multiple flow
>     specifications to be conveyed in the same Resource Reservation
>     Protocol (RSVPv1) reservation message exchange. This ability helps
>     optimize an agreeable bandwidth through a network between endpoints
>     in a single round trip
> 
> There was hum indicating general WG support for this at the last IETF in 
> Prague. I applied to the AD to amend our Charter to allow this work, 
> which was approved. So we are now ready to make a formal decision and 
> this email is to allow people to confirm that there is sufficient energy 
> to complete this work in TSVWG.
> 
> 
> * PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document 
> in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.

a good idea.

> 
> * Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document 
> during its development - our AD has indicated that we expect to have at 
> least 4 people who commit to review this within the WG, perform a 
> detailed review in WGLC and provide appropriate comments if called upon 
> during the IESG review. If you can promise to do this please say!

I'm willing.  (I have already provided some comments off line that I
look forward to discussing on-list, assuming the draft becomes a WG
document.)

Lou

> 
> 
> Please provide any comments at the latest by Wednesday 29th June 2011.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Gorry Fairhurst
> (TSVWG Co-Chair)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>