IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Mon, 20 June 2011 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jgunn6@csc.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303A321F85FB; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21gBSVc6rpdc; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail85.messagelabs.com (mail85.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CD121F8652; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: jgunn6@csc.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-85.messagelabs.com!1308583423!8664102!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.17; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [20.137.2.87]
Received: (qmail 17761 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2011 15:23:43 -0000
Received: from amer-mta101.csc.com (HELO amer-mta101.csc.com) (20.137.2.87) by server-12.tower-85.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Jun 2011 15:23:43 -0000
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (amer-gw09.amer.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta101.csc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.3.3mp) with ESMTP id p5KFNfQ2016695; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:23:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4DFF058D.1010309@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <4DFF058D.1010309@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06
X-KeepSent: 98B4E914:45E5CB13-852578B5:00548E38; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2FP1 CCH2 April 23, 2009
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Message-ID: <OF98B4E914.45E5CB13-ON852578B5.00548E38-852578B5.0054932D@csc.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:23:40 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 8.5.2FP1 HF29|January 09, 2011) at 06/20/2011 11:22:12 AM, Serialize complete at 06/20/2011 11:22:12 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0054928D852578B5_="
Cc: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:23:48 -0000

Good idea.
Janet

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in 
delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to 
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement 
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such 
purpose.



From:
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To:
tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Cc:
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Date:
06/20/2011 04:33 AM
Subject:
Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06



The authors of "IntServ Extension to Allow Signaling of Multiple Traffic 
Specifications and Multiple Flow Specifications in RSVPv1" 
(draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec) requests that this is adopted 
as WG item.

    This draft defines extensions to Integrated Services (IntServ)
    allowing  multiple traffic specifications and multiple flow
    specifications to be conveyed in the same Resource Reservation
    Protocol (RSVPv1) reservation message exchange. This ability helps
    optimize an agreeable bandwidth through a network between endpoints
    in a single round trip

There was hum indicating general WG support for this at the last IETF in 
Prague. I applied to the AD to amend our Charter to allow this work, 
which was approved. So we are now ready to make a formal decision and 
this email is to allow people to confirm that there is sufficient energy 
to complete this work in TSVWG.


* PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document 
in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.

* Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document 
during its development - our AD has indicated that we expect to have at 
least 4 people who commit to review this within the WG, perform a 
detailed review in WGLC and provide appropriate comments if called upon 
during the IESG review. If you can promise to do this please say!


Please provide any comments at the latest by Wednesday 29th June 2011.


Best regards

Gorry Fairhurst
(TSVWG Co-Chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email