IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06

Randy Stewart <randall@lakerest.net> Sat, 25 June 2011 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <randall@lakerest.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A2211E80BA for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2NTtKn2LxOw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakerest.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:240:585:2:213:d4ff:fef3:2d8d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4962A228011 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.122] (bsd3.lakerest.net [70.155.160.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakerest.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5PMUfxw010536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:30:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from randall@lakerest.net)
Subject: Re: Call for WG Adoption of draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Randy Stewart <randall@lakerest.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110620165434.0E585C174BE@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:30:40 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <61C72BC0-FD52-4765-8E7B-3AF9AE225DE8@lakerest.net>
References: <20110620165434.0E585C174BE@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:30:57 -0000

+1

(and yes I would be willing to review the document)

R
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:

>> * PLEASE send an email to this list if you think adopting this document 
>> in TSVWG is a good or bad idea.
> 
> I think it is a good (long delayed) idea
> 
>> * Please also indicate if you are willing to REVIEW such a document 
>> during its development 
> 
> I am
> 
> Scott
> 

-----
Randall Stewart
randall@lakerest.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email