Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3953A0FE8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:25:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9O5J8QDS6an for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:25:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB053A0FE5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id n16so27699181lfb.4; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:24:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=m1wvGOj2cDsKJY+vNi0G2ERIssk40itfcZoVuNhLHt0=; b=DVBCIevSHkeDlyMhbSc28ng89BwfrDnOx7ptuLE3IHFmrGnpkkUNbjvvMMIeDqddXd suhczKXJoP81n95AcguNU7Jf5XTSoyT2tMQ9ZankNV0rZmJ42JMC+5yA/Vrj1tO3Zmod pIwZb+0aXlNK8w+VU5yfa1BXCJqBWlfbYbZY4xNX7n8ggKS3Pn0pkESReb7iVoX5RVp1 rj4aO0uYHJ4IHjDI0D8uCW/uzTHGMzyrTYKusx0s5I+kW4z07xZr+1DODeiK5Gz+TpBp 98jK+7YUG16bW5F012SH98mdkUzekBu0OHSvyNFYnYGZ6krVvz1QZkCkqMFmA4iAhYRe G6gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=m1wvGOj2cDsKJY+vNi0G2ERIssk40itfcZoVuNhLHt0=; b=j9HTOn9/t0OfTfAjyFUfKe8a5GalORbiC8U4xTdA15hRZNnDfrk7cAofpZO9HgqIr4 oRntZCWK6yY+6wAs1j5LVmRjjWhtj4irtsu/MEPnwpVY93BjJPCZD2h4Qy227dyJSLhV zRnN4sDX80sc4wx5bmVOQImA5HBNiF/8aH9cq0MTgJ32nneeqIrylmFPJOwr5VLyddsI UY3cmuYWL08m8GKdD6TYbhCnxAstdH7+JIKXO+1TRC7dwaykq0NeB3XUkVOwExW6+qcx aCQ7vttHWeyzUTQP6t94pw9Opf1GKgbY9kCnDllK7VdpnO1MG8b3ALxdekoWPweYdDD1 Iqpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BC81euR9JuSOmi0itT1VZsTQehc5F0NPSKfIxCBLD9mFudE5K hXXWyBBEIbtLwJJVb4GFqbo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq8QRLIcEvahClf0i7hUS/pucb0QIsZyZQdwu3utvcStim1BjdK834tzBRuci1RNpohm0nQQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6d16:: with SMTP id i22mr8673359lfc.510.1615303495990; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (176-93-29-60.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.29.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm1878926lfc.23.2021.03.09.07.24.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB22993B8CE19FD0F077917AADC2929@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:24:54 +0200
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "maprg@ietf.org" <maprg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <414FE1AC-50BD-4929-9731-B5EBDD4A820A@gmail.com>
References: <161519742798.12373.8424747645620734074@ietfa.amsl.com> <4cc306ea278dab68741b0c27713bfb7c84522e11.camel@heistp.net> <72467bfe9a38edee74c4ab8e12ec350e23315ec9.camel@heistp.net> <ce2c8397-1bb9-8634-7822-88b9ba6d3b22@bobbriscoe.net> <0F3DBF89-9DA3-401C-9793-5F0F2C72ED5E@gmx.de> <22CD0890-346C-4A43-AE20-DCED78E99FEA@gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB22993B8CE19FD0F077917AADC2929@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/KBJuebVivp7l6b046wS4NgwtEdc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:25:01 -0000

> On 9 Mar, 2021, at 5:04 pm, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> If you update Cake, please consider to add the possibility to distinguish
> between the ECT(0) and ECT(1) codepoint. A first reasonable step is to make
> the algorithm ignore the ECT(1) codepoint. This is brought up in section 5.1
> in the L4S opt draft and also suggested by Tom Henderson.

No, because that would violate RFC-3168.  Until that is actually deprecated by the IETF, we should continue to retain compliance with it.

 - Jonathan Morton