IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 28 November 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354CA3A0FB8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 06:20:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-ZCb0jQPCCI for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 06:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7F73A0DC8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 06:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 86B79B1; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:20:07 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1606573207; bh=g1PidJ/TujVv3kSqBRxzKVLOiYaFFZyxI2Aq046UoYE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o17J8FwQI9PTLUVZVwAj1jyAxz5FK13jqDa5Zuh4X9PyCLPfKnNnDtVkBw9rAySPQ NzzvA16QaRgFkcxMGDctkbr2MhXxdEOQCZhCc+8coLYhUDxkuOjYvaT9/2Sa+kNYbX KjXEk1r/kV8C4mBLXNx/vTesxFwBTuEROH6zgtOc=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83706AF; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:20:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:20:07 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <066C60AF-39A3-41EF-B9E9-938AA1A707F5@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281512350.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011201413100.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9B5474B3-4384-4A20-81C3-5251246AA594@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011221548210.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <066C60AF-39A3-41EF-B9E9-938AA1A707F5@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Y9YpZU4muZDhQk29ibjO6bS3WBU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:20:16 -0000

On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Sebastian Moeller wrote:

> As it turns out there is a nssfq_codel modul for qualcomm`s nss network acellerator cores:
> see https://forum.openwrt.org/t/ipq806x-nss-drivers/12613/2160
>
> Is that a sufficient response to put tge hypothesis to rest that acelleration techniques do not offer fq_codel?

This is great news. Do you have more examples?

I looked over the devices list with that SoC and most of them were 130EUR 
here (or more). Pretty high-end devices.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email