Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

David Booth <david@dbooth.org> Mon, 12 October 2009 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <david@dbooth.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460FA28C24F for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCu9pamUATu8 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CAB83A68E4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56650 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 17:01:34 -0000
Received: from 209.6.102.232 (HELO ?192.168.7.2?) (209.6.102.232) by relay03.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 17:01:34 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.197.102.232
From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
To: Steve Suehring <suehring@braingia.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:01:34 -0400
Message-Id: <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:01:36 -0000

I don't see a need to define a new URI scheme for this.  You can just
define an http URI prefix for this purpose, as described in
http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/

Furthermore, as Graham Klyne suggested during a similar discussion
earlier, "an HTTP URI can also retrieve a protocol [handler]
implementation"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html
This could dramatically improve the adoption rate of a new protocol.

David Booth


On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:01 -0500, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Attached is a draft to be submitted to the IETF for URI scheme related 
> to secure shell (ssh).  The draft was originally included in the secsh 
> Working Group which has since concluded.  
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri/
> 
> I recently received a request to pick this draft back up and the 
> co-author and I will be submitting it to the IETF under the Application 
> Area.
> 
> Please provide feedback as appropriate.
> 
> Thank you for your time.
> 
> Steve Suehring
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.