IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 09 October 2009 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A2C28C1AA for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.340, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFHNfWMZb03e for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0050028C21E for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; l=2863; q=dns/txt; s=amsiport01001; t=1255111303; x=1256320903; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Re: =20[Uri-review]=20ssh=20URI|Date:=20Fri,=2009=20Oct=20200 9=2020:01:41=20+0200|Message-ID:=20<4ACF7A85.5000207@cisc o.com>|To:=20Steve=20Suehring=20<suehring@braingia.org> |CC:=20uri-review@ietf.org,=20uri@w3.org|MIME-Version:=20 1.0|In-Reply-To:=20<20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org> |References:=20<20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>; bh=N3w5nbPohhKMl0CIR+tDRr9HuThND892HH8Zj4v8W+w=; b=uWkHy/2P95wMdHovVxvZrzXKhCbMTNDS9ZXc1ttuWVTg6uxe83H+/RJD jdwoOeRr3vnB8MjmPz6HNAJGRszj3JRNzz05khjxalgFyiZoM7IMa7HHP ItVO8TS/m9rHF4BHunDOY8vvMMQcxiCVSkzhpSkgM/g0F96Te2k+ew478 A=;
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am4AAP8Wz0qQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACBUlQvmDEBARYkBqcfmEGELAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.44,533,1249257600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="51412803"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2009 18:01:41 +0000
Received: from elear-mac.local (dhcp-10-61-101-27.cisco.com [10.61.101.27]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n99I1ft8005338; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:01:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4ACF7A85.5000207@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:01:41 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091003 Shredder/3.0pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Suehring <suehring@braingia.org>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020006080805070805040004"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:59:59 -0000

According to RFC 3986 you can have a ; in the userinfo.  Still I agree 
with the other reviewer.  It's asking for a kick in the teeth with some 
broken parser somewhere.

Elioty

On 10/9/09 6:01 PM, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Attached is a draft to be submitted to the IETF for URI scheme related
> to secure shell (ssh).  The draft was originally included in the secsh
> Working Group which has since concluded.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri/
>
> I recently received a request to pick this draft back up and the
> co-author and I will be submitting it to the IETF under the Application
> Area.
>
> Please provide feedback as appropriate.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> Steve Suehring
>    
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email