Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Bob Aman <bob@sporkmonger.com> Mon, 12 October 2009 22:58 UTC
Return-Path: <sporkmonger@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A8C28C12B for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUr3tjSSSU5s for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f204.google.com (mail-pz0-f204.google.com [209.85.222.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC02D3A689B for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk42 with SMTP id 42so2489458pzk.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=poRXnE8lTx8BUfkaNQREMUCPv9TMpLau45Ed0+IyKW8=; b=o9DZ+AgwkMahDeh+gCocUPVV7S9HVg/AFyIafFCYkZasc0mpDQoc0JNkIdHzh4HbfP qEzSIrR997yUlR67SkMURFTIUiSUn7AwdSUpqILG1aq6RbmsdrmX678fb1UV9NU5LkUX ICRJt/3U5a+BAztcF0krOiPwewUmO39WIy4hQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Dg/QQQOglWmYBFmAKZ9YdzDyhdDo/OiFEzBqTj7m3hAmJgiGJT8ax8/yRI2RStAtQQ 4Ng+KnnmlMBrsCn3y/WzWJYdaj01zh1rYNdHtFc1lzrt2jUnJKXL2rY+f4zC8hovFxy3 wkBz1A18/41emr39vOPTxiQazM9YSiTpKZ7Lc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sporkmonger@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.249.22 with SMTP id w22mr509662wfh.319.1255388298472; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20091012175331.GA3277@braingia.org>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org> <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop> <20091012175331.GA3277@braingia.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:58:18 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 77827eebf1e70537
Message-ID: <81c242240910121558w697db915ne6a71e56903e05a7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Aman <bob@sporkmonger.com>
To: Steve Suehring <suehring@braingia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:06:42 -0700
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bob@sporkmonger.com
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:58:54 -0000
> I don't think that the http URI prefix is a good solution for the ssh > protocol. There is too much room for userland confusion which is > undesirable due to the nature of ssh traffic. > > Steve I have to agree with Steve on this. I'm already terribly confused by David's suggestion. -Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI 'Steve Suehring'
- [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI John Cowan
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Conrad Parker
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Paul Prescod