Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
David Booth <david@dbooth.org> Tue, 13 October 2009 01:12 UTC
Return-Path: <david@dbooth.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204703A6831 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1hjaU+bZ3sCn for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F6F23A677E for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 78298 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 01:12:41 -0000
Received: from 209.6.102.232 (HELO ?192.168.7.2?) (209.6.102.232) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 01:12:41 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.197.102.232
From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
To: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
In-Reply-To: <4AD3C117.10607.660B7CE4@dan.tobias.name>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org> , <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop> , <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771@POCZTOWIEC> <4AD3C117.10607.660B7CE4@dan.tobias.name>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:12:39 -0400
Message-Id: <1255396359.5481.10164.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:12:42 -0000
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 19:51 -0400, Daniel R. Tobias wrote: > On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > > > David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do > > you?. If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that > > would save it from the http black hole. > > It does seem to be an ideological position for some. Excuse me? By piggy-backing on http URIs, you can get easier, faster adoption with more user-friendly fallback behavior. To my mind that's an engineering concern -- not an idealogical position. -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI 'Steve Suehring'
- [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI John Cowan
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Conrad Parker
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Paul Prescod