Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Bob Aman <bob@sporkmonger.com> Tue, 13 October 2009 01:56 UTC
Return-Path: <sporkmonger@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3631F28C14C for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oo+AveqiewUa for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f212.google.com (mail-gx0-f212.google.com [209.85.217.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4578228C2C8 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so10518228gxk.8 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FncAbEl3d8t6oS7jwUMFM34Dq5BnTz+YPb8s6iZYsZI=; b=Y0jkIKjk7JnZH/+p+z6Z/Rkj0/VZi/+vv4I6JwkaECg3FwS//1UM0JzFvh0JjzJTpI OAqZVxSBdkH+W5JDSCREqRnUWYOiKTt8t5nkVGjJzP6D1zTdfemltk6JHGXDgrjGIdae kYv4M/8sHnU4VBDCC+sJsxl8IyjU5sepPq9S4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=UwAev/BwnhY39wduQjNVVMbbSI/UkHom4HAQvlER3Cb5fC/qpxDxKuIXizxWzlRJvp L0WJz/KrCiRmGDGFZDmgJyPRXY7e7xn/BLJgUrb5oS5fRQtBFKvpvVcZfmHrk3WW3Kg5 Wy8qd4Xgd9tkiiC4xIxH8zM7iIaJY3bJiLaxE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sporkmonger@gmail.com
Received: by 10.150.240.4 with SMTP id n4mr6526405ybh.1.1255398959480; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1255398140.5481.10279.camel@dbooth-laptop>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org> <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop> <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771@POCZTOWIEC> <1255395156.5481.10083.camel@dbooth-laptop> <81c242240910121816y4becb1aevae5008b23537df2c@mail.gmail.com> <1255398140.5481.10279.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:55:59 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cb1bdcbb255eef85
Message-ID: <81c242240910121855q52319dbatafb6ee46c3364ed@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Aman <bob@sporkmonger.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bob@sporkmonger.com
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:56:02 -0000
>> I have a problem with this in the general case because I don't think >> there's currently a way for such a URI to be registered to a specific >> application in any major browser. > > Take a look at greasemonkey: > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748 > Greasemonkey is based on recognizing URI patterns and performing special > functions when such patterns are recognized. I'm familiar with greasemonkey. Last I checked, greasemonkey didn't launch applications so much as rewrite pages in place, and even if it could, that's not even remotely user-friendly. Beyond that, it's not something that really applies outside of the Firefox ecosystem. The point isn't that it's not technically feasible, the point is that it's a path that has way more technical and psychological hurdles to overcome than getting a scheme registered with the IANA. -Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI 'Steve Suehring'
- [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI John Cowan
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Conrad Parker
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Paul Prescod