IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Mon, 12 October 2009 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dan@tobias.name>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FEE3A6997 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRSJemU+dSMJ for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from looneymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC6F3A67A8 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-219-95-0.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [98.219.95.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by looneymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD9915D570; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Organization: Barely
To: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:51:51 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4AD3C117.10607.660B7CE4@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771@POCZTOWIEC>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>, <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop>, <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771@POCZTOWIEC>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.51)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:52:31 -0000

On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:

> David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do
> you?.  If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that
> would save it from the http black hole.

It does seem to be an ideological position for some.


-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email