Re: "Difficult Characters" draft (in URLs)

Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Sun, 11 May 1997 20:13 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa13318; 11 May 97 16:13 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13666; 11 May 97 16:13 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25774 for uri-out; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:02:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25769 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:02:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA06412 for <uri@bunyip.com>; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:02:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from casablanca.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.16.111]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <18819(13)>; Sun, 11 May 1997 13:01:51 PDT
Received: from bronze-208.parc.xerox.com ([13.0.209.122]) by casablanca.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <71841>; Sun, 11 May 1997 13:01:35 PDT
Message-ID: <337615DC.7C2F@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 11:54:20 PDT
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Organization: Xerox PARC
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
CC: Alain LaBont/e'/ <alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca>, URI mailing list <uri@bunyip.com>
Subject: Re: "Difficult Characters" draft (in URLs)
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970508161120.245v-100000@enoshima>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

Martin,

> "Keyboards exist" is not very helpful. If the market penetration of such
> keyboards is 10%, we better leave out UCAL; if it is 95%, we don't
> have to worry much.

It surprises me to see you fall into the same kind of position
that -- in the larger scale -- was the argument for keeping
URLs to "ASCII-only".

What is the scope of "the market"? If "the market" is "Alain",
then the market penetration is 100%. If "the market" is "all
keyboards on the planet" then, of course, the "market
penetration" of keyboards that can type anything other
than simple ASCII is still quite small.

We are really talking about "character entry method"
rather than "keyboard" since, as has been pointed out,
with the "right software" it's possible to enter almost
any kind of character from almost any kind of terminal;
and "market penetration" might want to be clarified
as to whether you're interested in the percentage of
"things that are being sold in the marketplace now"
or "existing, installed, usable", or at least some
forecast of the latter.