Re: "Difficult Characters" draft

"Michael Kung <MKUNG.US.ORACLE.COM>" <MKUNG@us.oracle.com> Tue, 06 May 1997 15:32 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa26526; 6 May 97 11:32 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12236; 6 May 97 11:32 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA14277 for uri-out; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA14272 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from inet16.us.oracle.com (inet16.us.oracle.com [192.86.155.100]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA25720 for <uri@bunyip.com>; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:53:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailsun2.us.oracle.com (mailsun2.us.oracle.com [144.25.88.74]) by inet16.us.oracle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA11728; Tue, 6 May 1997 07:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailsun2.us.oracle.com (SMI-8.6/37.8) id HAA04330; Tue, 6 May 1997 07:59:52 -0700
Message-Id: <199705061459.HAA04330@mailsun2.us.oracle.com>
Date: 06 May 97 07:45:12 -0700
From: "Michael Kung <MKUNG.US.ORACLE.COM>" <MKUNG@us.oracle.com>
To: mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch
Subject: Re: "Difficult Characters" draft
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
X-Orcl-Application: In-Reply-To: UNX10.US.ORACLE.COM:mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch's message of 05-May-97 02:26
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Oracle InterOffice (version 4.0.2.1.40)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_ORCL_10757193_0_11919705060860520"
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

Correct.  The point here is that we need to define a canonical format or open 
format.  The current proposal is written with simple scripts in mind. 
 
Regards, 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Michael Kung					 
40P-972                                         Phone:      (415) 506-6954 
Manager, Server Globalization Technology	Fax:        (415) 506-7225 
Languages and Relational Technology		Email: mkung@us.oracle.com 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--- Begin Message ---
On 4 May 1997, Michael Kung <MKUNG.US.ORACLE.COM> wrote:

> How about the BIDI support?  Should we allow the BIDI mark?

There are several BIDI marks. Their problem is that they don't
get transcribed well on paper :-(.

> How about 
> non-spacing mark? 

Some nonspacing marks will have to be allowed in some contexts.
An example is the ZWNJ (zero width non-joiner), which is needed
for writing Persian, and which works in this context. Others
have to be examined carefully, but disallowed or strongly
discouraged in most cases.


Regards,	Martin.

--- End Message ---