Re: "Difficult Characters" draft

"Michael Kung <MKUNG.US.ORACLE.COM>" <MKUNG@us.oracle.com> Mon, 05 May 1997 00:39 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa28986; 4 May 97 20:39 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18843; 4 May 97 20:39 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA18995 for uri-out; Sun, 4 May 1997 20:15:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA18990 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Sun, 4 May 1997 20:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from inet16.us.oracle.com (inet16.us.oracle.com [192.86.155.100]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA09714; Sun, 4 May 1997 20:15:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailsun2.us.oracle.com (mailsun2.us.oracle.com [144.25.88.74]) by inet16.us.oracle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28705; Sun, 4 May 1997 17:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailsun2.us.oracle.com (SMI-8.6/37.8) id RAA04505; Sun, 4 May 1997 17:21:36 -0700
Message-Id: <199705050021.RAA04505@mailsun2.us.oracle.com>
Date: 04 May 97 17:06:11 -0700
From: "Michael Kung <MKUNG.US.ORACLE.COM>" <MKUNG@us.oracle.com>
To: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: "Difficult Characters" draft
Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch, uri@bunyip.com
X-Orcl-Application: In-Reply-To: UNX10.US.ORACLE.COM:owner-uri@Bunyip.Com's message of 21-Apr-97 14:36
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Oracle InterOffice (version 4.0.2.1.40)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_ORCL_10718388_0_11919705041822370"
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

How about the BIDI support?  Should we allow the BIDI mark?  How about 
non-spacing mark? 
 
Regards, 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Michael Kung					 
40P-972                                         Phone:      (415) 506-6954 
Manager, Server Globalization Technology	Fax:        (415) 506-7225 
Languages and Relational Technology		Email: mkung@us.oracle.com 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--- Begin Message ---
A 17:58 97-05-02 +0200, Martin J. Duerst a écrit :
[Larry] :
>> Using UCS in identifiers that are normally "case insensitive"
>> in ASCII, and the issues, e.g., similar upper-case forms,
>> the role of accents and equivalence.

[Martin] :
>With "the role of accents", do you mean the French case, where
>accents may be removed on uppercasing?

[Alain] :
Accents may not be removed on uppercasing for orthodox French spelling.
Worldwide.
Source: all major dictionaries (none uses lower case for its entries, and
accents are all there!), all grammarian authorities (the major one is
Grevisse, in Belgium), all typographical authorities in France, without
counting the proverbial Canadian and Quebecer usage. For one century there
has been confusion on this, due mostly to mechanical typerwiters
embarrassment. That's fortunately over.

However accents normally don't count much for alphabetic order, they are
considerwed only in case of quasi-homography (cote, côte, coté, côté,
pèche, pêche, péché).

Alain LaBonté
Québec
--- End Message ---