Re: "Difficult Characters" draft

Alain LaBont/e'/ <> Wed, 07 May 1997 17:14 UTC

Received: from cnri by id aa03842; 7 May 97 13:14 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15366; 7 May 97 13:14 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA07607 for uri-out; Wed, 7 May 1997 12:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mocha.Bunyip.Com []) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07602 for <>; Wed, 7 May 1997 12:43:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05765 for <>; Wed, 7 May 1997 12:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( by (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA03440; Wed, 7 May 1997 12:48:48 -0400
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 beta 14 (32) [F]
Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 12:42:05 -0400
To: "Martin J. Duerst" <>
From: Alain LaBont/e'/ <>
Subject: Re: "Difficult Characters" draft
Cc: URI mailing list <>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970507104936.245Y-100000@enoshima>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by id MAA07607

A 11:23 97-05-07 +0200, Martin J. Duerst a écrit :
>I think we pretty much agree that we should discourage URLs with
>accented uppercase letters.

I personally do not, nor any of my colleagues... We would agree with this
if upper case were not allowed.

>> >We don't want to ask the French user more than the US user,
>> >when compared to his/her language abilities. And up to now,
>> >we don't.
>> You do. If equiavlences are not processed adequately, given that
>> equivalence processing exists today. You ask either exact match or match
>> independent of case but dependent on accents... that's not good enough...
>Well, I don't actually propose that. I just say that it wouldn't
>be to strange to consider case equivalences but not accent equivalences.
>In sorting, accents also have higher distinctive power than case, don't they.

Yes, in general and no for unprecise matches that render upper and lower
case equivalent.

>	"Copy it exactly, with case and everything."
>is much more user friendly, because it is the only one that
>works consistently.

I can agree with that. I think everybody can agree with that.

Alain LaBonté