IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Port 465

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 10 March 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8863E1A043E for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9qLKp8U1o5p for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AE11A0438 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=324; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394465417; x=1395675017; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DVmhRQbyJlYKoi9gcvhBbgyheTbBCaQsa33X9zvIFts=; b=IVdiOru2uyZGyUCVUmCDLMfhAVMwjAPGBCFZNXpsDyiFXvpRYan/rhZX i5RgXPx66Anv1MnuELU8KJBbQnJe54mKUB0AKEecyAFeueugApMHAAGwx ZQJEqrJAETVMVGJ94vPI2AwEAgrs0sunzmYDb/YP8fNkhiaemWgXR7B2g U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFADnaHVOQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABagwaEGL42gRsWdIIlAQEBBCNVEQsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECASsaBgEMCAEBh3WuaaBjF4EpjTmCb4FJAQOYRZItgy48
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,624,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="3417444"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2014 15:30:16 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.220.154]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2AFUGKb005730; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:30:16 GMT
Message-ID: <531DDA88.9030003@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:30:16 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, 'Chris Newman' <chris.newman@oracle.com>, "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>, uta@ietf.org
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711FB9AAD89@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <8691BA706C9BAB52D64A8444@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <00cd01cf3b05$4e5fa500$eb1eef00$@huitema.net> <531D60FC.2090604@cisco.com> <020f01cf3c74$41845c20$c48d1460$@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <020f01cf3c74$41845c20$c48d1460$@huitema.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/6zImsGI_JmytAW5PjI94Eg0VFZs
Subject: Re: [Uta] Port 465
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:30:24 -0000

Christian,

On 3/10/14, 4:20 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Routers running URD intercept all packets using port 465, regardless of
> destination.
> That particularity of the URD design seems to be the root of the problem. 

No.  The root of the problem is that there are two services using the
same port.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email