IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uta] What's the right thing to do about Port 465?

Kurt Andersen <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 10 March 2014 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01B71A0489 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c38_eGKC5HWo for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFEA1A0473 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t61so8778518wes.30 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=gYWDukC9JIJ+PSaW1elesHzWa9w18L33ZrkEH3uRSS8=; b=KnCruZcLVwODIw5iBv8CB0Hf2c1ms4fN40k5t8p9U9ZE4LBsCg3bJEPlYGv+htnPNw kGefdgxNDXrtmtcxVJnE7uxjxDsS3HvavbaSnmjcJmYD22Y046N7G4fPTCzr1waoYW/Y qiB0kFROxQeCsnBRydZpNxS2Kz/tDZKcuLSYs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gYWDukC9JIJ+PSaW1elesHzWa9w18L33ZrkEH3uRSS8=; b=S+CA/ECPHqyOVnRcj9qiDdWjCo/Ps+Eyaj7jaLQL0psB+VjerqRrShB5rhWT+P+igy sZi/X1rKulMRoqIPZDyVCJ2PF7SbijJJEmuGemaWVhhDE0k+XZdd0lz3Xqe5OT9iz+kU Ce4C1Thkk0YvcpTOixSk/RhGVAnnPh0R5PUMjt6Jq1IbG+0B0NTFdsxW4tFCfanrIUc/ Rm1oN64OLKhOTYgSZAyKIWrJRqEcT9AxhTtPTM2meLONO2iQML3NHNXr2ud2cWapARCP P+nDp9mskh4xXr97cWa7XwyKYXp9SXjtLa4co502kIGfBn08NFpO44Moif6DUnl+avoz 6qSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7khOEki1sd4wBL06u55+8bHmkzYbf6mcRM6E/fZNGUjdhfZlrKBEyvEd77xCDP1YqtEaI
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.77 with SMTP id z13mr1411966wjw.64.1394461304282; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.194.109.200 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1rW0KY8U5iup3-6J7B1Cyp_v8K+0LSJ9wNdWFXiMO6xgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711FB9AAD89@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <8691BA706C9BAB52D64A8444@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <00cd01cf3b05$4e5fa500$eb1eef00$@huitema.net> <531D60FC.2090604@cisco.com> <531D6338.7050505@network-heretics.com> <CABuGu1rW0KY8U5iup3-6J7B1Cyp_v8K+0LSJ9wNdWFXiMO6xgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:21:44 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SxYiOr6XbHu1ndhQfIZzfGvhvOo
Message-ID: <CABuGu1r8tcvp-S-8xYEX3NMxXR+bX6JDtgswzjH+=Ocdgn6aBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kurt Andersen <kboth@drkurt.com>
To: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bfcfc98b202ca04f44152f8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/K7akw01s0JUZyTANudx49Z-eFlw
Subject: [Uta] What's the right thing to do about Port 465?
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:21:51 -0000

On Monday, March 10, 2014, Keith Moore
<moore@network-heretics.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','moore@network-heretics.com');>>
wrote:

> On 03/10/2014 02:51 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> Routers running URD intercept all packets using port 465, regardless of
>> destination.
>>
>
> So is the right thing to do:
>
> a)  Recommend port 465 anyway, but document the problem with these routers?
>

I think that the right thing would be to have Cisco move and keep 465 for
smtps. It's much more likely that one vendor can/will change than that we
can get a decentralized mail usage to change on both provider and consumer
sides.

--Kurt Andersen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email