IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Port 465

"Joe St Sauver" <joe@oregon.uoregon.edu> Mon, 10 March 2014 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@oregon.uoregon.edu>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84C61A0232 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVg2kbyBKn5a for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grey.uoregon.edu (grey.uoregon.edu [128.223.214.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 25F6E1A022B for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:05:10 -0700
Message-Id: <14031016051057_222AB@oregon.uoregon.edu>
From: Joe St Sauver <joe@oregon.uoregon.edu>
To: kboth@drkurt.com
X-VMS-To: SMTP%"kboth@drkurt.com"
X-VMS-Cc: SMTP%"uta@ietf.org"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/UjR28z-ozsaMvHOB_1LFafN8Z1c
Cc: uta@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uta] Port 465
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:08:45 -0000

Kurt commented:

#I'd be interested to know how 465 was "taken away" from smtps without
#sufficient notice to the community. I still think it is the right approach
#to move urd rather than smtps. Has anyone asked Cisco about it?

Nice stub historical discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTPS

Regards,

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email