IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] What's the right thing to do about Port 465?

t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Mon, 10 March 2014 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C96C1A04A3 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ekwuq280B_L for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3lp0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244F1A043E for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DB3PRD0411HT005.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.53) by DB4PR07MB252.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.231.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.888.9; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:46:55 +0000
Message-ID: <07ad01cf3c77$36976520$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Kurt Andersen <kboth@drkurt.com>, uta@ietf.org
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711FB9AAD89@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <8691BA706C9BAB52D64A8444@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <00cd01cf3b05$4e5fa500$eb1eef00$@huitema.net> <531D60FC.2090604@cisco.com> <531D6338.7050505@network-heretics.com> <CABuGu1rW0KY8U5iup3-6J7B1Cyp_v8K+0LSJ9wNdWFXiMO6xgw@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1r8tcvp-S-8xYEX3NMxXR+bX6JDtgswzjH+=Ocdgn6aBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:41:25 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.53]
X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR07CA002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.16.42) To DB4PR07MB252.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.231.153)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 014617085B
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(13464003)(51704005)(51444003)(24454002)(479174003)(377454003)(199002)(189002)(52314003)(89996001)(66066001)(47776003)(23756003)(53806001)(56776001)(47446002)(51856001)(94316002)(93136001)(46102001)(86362001)(93516002)(93916002)(76482001)(92726001)(80022001)(31966008)(87266001)(33646001)(85306002)(54316002)(4396001)(65816001)(59766001)(42186004)(77982001)(74502001)(94946001)(74876001)(95416001)(74662001)(74366001)(56816005)(49866001)(50466002)(87976001)(77096001)(83072002)(62236002)(85852003)(47736001)(90146001)(63696002)(76796001)(88136002)(15975445006)(87286001)(81542001)(77156001)(50226001)(84392001)(74706001)(92566001)(81342001)(44716002)(76786001)(14496001)(79102001)(61296002)(62966002)(69226001)(97186001)(19580405001)(95666003)(47976001)(83322001)(80976001)(44736004)(50986001)(97336001)(19580395003)(74416001)(7726001)(9078065003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR07MB252; H:DB3PRD0411HT005.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:157.56.253.53; FPR:7886FD38.AC17AFC2.417072EB.54D1C3E1.201EB; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/Kn1UU5bpUCqES9T02vb96INweYE
Subject: Re: [Uta] What's the right thing to do about Port 465?
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:47:05 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt Andersen" <kboth@drkurt.com>
To: <uta@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:21 PM
> On Monday, March 10, 2014, Keith Moore
>
<moore@network-heretics.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','moore@network-h
eretics.com');>>
> wrote:
>
> > On 03/10/2014 02:51 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >
> >> Routers running URD intercept all packets using port 465,
regardless of
> >> destination.
> >>
> >
> > So is the right thing to do:
> >
> > a)  Recommend port 465 anyway, but document the problem with these
routers?
> >
>
> I think that the right thing would be to have Cisco move and keep 465
for
> smtps. It's much more likely that one vendor can/will change than that
we
> can get a decentralized mail usage to change on both provider and
consumer
> sides.

Right thing legally but the wrong thing engineering-wise.

We have change control over smtps and so can hope to influence its
specification.

Tom Petch

> --Kurt Andersen
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email