IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Port 465

Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Fri, 07 March 2014 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7295F1A02BB for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:31:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMYVaogwAO8U for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emh02.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh02.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED771A01E9 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (a88-112-44-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.44.140]) by emh02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3896817E6; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 20:31:09 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:31:09 +0200
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20140307183109.GA23628@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711FB9AAD89@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <8691BA706C9BAB52D64A8444@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <5319C457.2050602@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5319C457.2050602@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/i8G7c3bqWe5xH-ZZDl3rv0TnvPE
Cc: uta@ietf.org, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Port 465
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:31:17 -0000

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:06:31PM +0000, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I did some quick checking with Toerless, who is the contact.  The port
> is assigned for a specific use, which is URD, a transitional technology
> for IGMPv2/IGMPv3 & SSM.  Cisco currently supports the use of the
> protocol, and perhaps as important, it is used as an intercept for *any*
> destination IP address on that port when URD is enabled.

So one can't use port 465 if URD is enabled on any port on the path?
Is this just UDP? Or also TCP?


-Ilari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email