IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Mon, 04 January 2016 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3B11A8A08 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syz-KM6g7Gy4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27331A8A0B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id u04GEAdO028879; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:10 -0800
Received: from XCH-PHX-413.sw.nos.boeing.com (xch-phx-413.sw.nos.boeing.com [10.57.37.45]) by blv-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id u04GE83c028857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:08 -0800
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.52]) by XCH-PHX-413.sw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.13.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:14:02 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
Thread-Index: AQHRRlkOIXy3SoYak0+sBDXuI8e0xp7rhkPw
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:14:02 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F988DB@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <201601031900.u03J0LMe009763@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201601031900.u03J0LMe009763@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/-KE0RIw5ZAbeUKkjC1AMP94m4I8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:14:07 -0000

Hi, I don't see how this discussion should go forward without a comparison
with what AERO already provides. AERO has been around for a long time
and has a comprehensive specification on how DHCPv6-PD works over
tunnels. It includes solutions for mobility, route optimization, reliability
and fault tolerance, security, multiple interfaces and prefix per host
considerations. Although the base AERO spec calls for GUE as the default
encapsulation, operation over GRE is specified in a companion document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aeromin/

I think the authors of unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host need to explain why
a different approach than AERO is needed.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of fred@cisco.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 11:00 AM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
> 
> And now for something a little different. I'd like to invite focused
> discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which we
> adopted at IETF 94
> 
> Slides are at
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-v6ops-4.pdf.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email