IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F381A891C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:54:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B77kSsrWQUx1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43C1D1A891A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:54:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1262; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1452167681; x=1453377281; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=fnyTkgrghfPl7GWCM29jsJtbDbiTkLQaPAvT3SCDqYM=; b=WuJQOjRKWWM0C+ov0wrwXdTcvR3DXr305MbuL8rh9CGLnBVAApLvtVXK hNbwLSjir3eZyjpTLicNIPw9wb7pmc2E71n2bIGxwc1wkjpfuwzhz/yFs 70Ww3yHlsVxddt/P7rE6iSkyfT473tBjO5A6dkyQLiYJtEkx21OeiEIXb 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D2AQCfUY5W/5ldJa1egzpSbQaIU7NTAQ2BZBgKhW0CHIEDOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENQEBBAEBASAROgsQAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiC8OsGCQYgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARQEgQGFVQGEfodzgUkBBJcLAY1VjnuOTAEgAQFChApyAYRYgQgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,532,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="224966879"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jan 2016 11:54:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u07BsdNI016799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:54:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 06:54:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 06:54:38 -0500
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
Thread-Index: AQHRRrIF7o8qQUloLkyynK24JTNGyJ7vFi6AgAAqaYCAARr1gA==
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:54:38 +0000
Message-ID: <D2B41023.63D12%evyncke@cisco.com>
References: <201601031900.u03J0LMe009763@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr3RY1oUtQnN675djc22f7B1Fhx0Ntsmr9rmZVEqmygRDg@mail.gmail.com> <D2B2F846.63BCC%evyncke@cisco.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F9ADDE@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F9ADDE@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.9.151119
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.56.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A9E265063AEE6D438A78D69487ED5064@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wIyysVC74WLxx2_4RA_TAgjVuLs>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:54:42 -0000

As all subscribers have a dedicated tunnel to the GW, this translates (to
me) into each subscriber has its own layer-2 link, so, no need to do DAD
as there is a unique UE per subscriber (my reading but I am not 100% sure).

If more than one UA can exist per tunnel, then indeed, Fred, you are right

-éric

On 6/01/16 21:01, "v6ops on behalf of Templin, Fred L"
<v6ops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:

>I have what I hope will be a simple question: what if two or more UEs
>configure
>identical IPv6 link-local addresses - will the WLAN-GW be able to tell
>them apart?
>Asked another way, what kind of unique node identifier does the WLAN-GW
>expect each UE to provide in the initial RS?
>
>Thanks - Fred
>fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email