IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B481A01A9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:02:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndDIkN6jnf_q for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.96.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4921A01A2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id u06K1tJx018160; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:01:55 -0600
Received: from XCH-PHX-411.sw.nos.boeing.com (xch-phx-411.sw.nos.boeing.com [10.57.37.42]) by stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id u06K1qh6018141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:01:52 -0600
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.52]) by XCH-PHX-411.sw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.11.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:01:51 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
Thread-Index: AQHRRrIFI13RUsgT4kOKL/Th7Sw3uJ7vFi6A///VyTA=
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:01:51 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F9ADDE@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <201601031900.u03J0LMe009763@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr3RY1oUtQnN675djc22f7B1Fhx0Ntsmr9rmZVEqmygRDg@mail.gmail.com> <D2B2F846.63BCC%evyncke@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2B2F846.63BCC%evyncke@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wlQCzHPxeBat3nmrI1YIomaiqw8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:02:12 -0000

I have what I hope will be a simple question: what if two or more UEs configure
identical IPv6 link-local addresses - will the WLAN-GW be able to tell them apart?
Asked another way, what kind of unique node identifier does the WLAN-GW
expect each UE to provide in the initial RS?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email