IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Wed, 06 January 2016 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249441A0191 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gWWhHnFtk1AD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs-a.tc.umn.edu (vs-a.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BB51A0180 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by vs-a.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:40:00 -0600 (CST)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173] #+LO+TS+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id g73so4765272ioe.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:40:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rheg+WG7pYVt7ACl1KRwUc4lWTH2w9bLiIPtsinFZRo=; b=ad7+WZhGSvZxFvZ+PcuRlPwnvUnj3UpP1+L+LbZ9nyS9tlauGBKbqAA2dx7IwIkUx4 09nWk6VYqH3P6QSzvFF8TDwbIjf/3oxmJFehqQ+02UTBZ1v8qOaRppTax5AJsKNXSklc JefOIDmU9mg8njn7ud34cZlIQn2+1CZlzVLC0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rheg+WG7pYVt7ACl1KRwUc4lWTH2w9bLiIPtsinFZRo=; b=Xcf3+lrWK5lNVy7Jxf+ySbDDIN2SyXGka+JP10OhWWCvWcjqI9e/Vgs7g6LFdDasyP fKiapxo5ObdoUbx2CkZsK/j7PxMlEAzWEx0C+KamL1DBgjhRURAZNBt1m7h+qOBT9VWu tnnvV+brjL0MCXMH1zWuoclGSobrEBQKx2RuibrUOCZamH0mIyE+wopQGg+wMtDrA5+y BpGJZkcEzGHx0rC4MkHRZAwD/AVZqh1QHvvGqM+T7fZRyeIbvPeSWpEm/eakB23QJJtB dQ3S+qHXQDqk5x2BhipD80vQB2BaQNvDZTIhceGOR2oAtISPdRrbssZtF2n3k8wwTrLg Gx8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmd7m6cpsqfXgZseOLLNdvHD7XMQlZKcyZelclUVM0dq/UIUurwJnds6PV+XPkJE7AlfzcfWE5F3mX+s+DMbeDwVz9iymRH71SCReb01B/fjaFzeyn+8murdEETYscdzgE7Md2YqGCYGXVfjQ7byzlBFO/fA==
X-Received: by 10.107.34.16 with SMTP id i16mr84983109ioi.22.1452040799560; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:39:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.107.34.16 with SMTP id i16mr84983098ioi.22.1452040799411; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x-10-104-129-194.uofm-secure.wireless.umn.edu ([2607:ea00:107:2001:18c0:8aaa:160a:f962]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm2018326igx.18.2016.01.05.16.39.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:39:57 -0800 (PST)
References: <201601031900.u03J0LMe009763@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F988DB@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <D2B0A71C.1B6D3F%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F99D14@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <6065AA2A-25BB-4B32-B88B-40A856D0E1EA@cisco.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F9A0EA@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
Message-ID: <568C625A.80808@umn.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:39:54 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F9A0EA@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/f0eDe79ICqo6Mj_WNEHnmSY8Jj4>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, John Brzozowski <John_Brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:40:07 -0000

On 1/5/16 18:35 , Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fred Baker (fred) [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 4:25 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L
>> Cc: John Brzozowski; v6ops@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Focused discussion: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> respect the fact that AERO has been around for some time, however, it does
>>>> not appear to be widely deployed.
>>>
>>> That is irrelevant.
>>
>> I'm sorry, no, it is relevant. We're not talking about IPv5, IPv7, TUBA, RFC 3053, RFC 5572, ISATAP (which one actually can describe as
>> widely deployed or having once been widely deployed) or quite a long list of other technologies.
>
> To be fair, AERO is about IPv6 and DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation - not some
> weird new IP protocol version. Likening it to IPv5, IPv7, TUBA, etc. is
> therefore inappropriate.

Doesn't it also include automatic tunneling, and require end client 
software to support it?

> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>
>> In a draft whose primary purpose (BCP) is to ask network administrators to not restrict hosts or host interfaces to a single address,
>> discussing a technology that might or might not have promise but is not widely received as a common current practice is at best
>> irrelevant.

What? wait a sec, isn't that draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability.

This is draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, and is something 
different, its related, but most definitely different.

In my view AERO and this draft are working in slightly overlapping, but 
different solution spaces.

-- 

-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email