IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 13 April 2017 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1276e13cdf=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7E13149C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 02:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MP750ylpQkyx for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00ADC131464 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 02:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1492077469; x=1492682269; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=VediIu1sduPNerfrd7ZuZvwdr JSU4xSz9mFfiZ2td8g=; b=iCyqX719Aii1u2cdRXdf21AJk0t6GBC5P1F9Uxti6 3N7KprtPfh6Vs5SG2lw1rh3c9NsS0fGHdyFxZEAubd3PxFCUgPRd0DFkcl8XDP2C HIWXm3l65BNH/Fl6kEEoTL37S/M/zHB/rRaJaoBgA7FPEqQasR7kBJdB6ZLIRxrS yQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=JAzVDee5I4lCKDdPAS6GXYJtsNpXK5UeYnEYvgKmqQSe7YByHo1e6TFE9wfS a+pUzQqJ7k5y0dLmpPQHs8XLpxfiZfeJjY2kHqOybbqu5crZiEut7io/A 3MYdjLiN1dj11tykxFBOLw5flwI+ptusF6sXb9BKTJ3JOsB3QqyC8o=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:57:49 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:57:48 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005407764.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:57:48 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170413:md50005407764::w7Tc8kq3H7C6b0mr:00009nNt
X-Return-Path: prvs=1276e13cdf=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:57:47 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CCC9A9C1-0942-4CF7-B9D3-897D06B24278@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
References: <D8F5C737-B01A-4EC8-9175-C4921C0CD69F@consulintel.es> <392D675B-73C4-40D3-81A8-A06907F5581D@employees.org> <3BBFC922-85BD-49B5-B39E-227F191BD48C@consulintel.es> <729244A1-E7AB-4BA0-8B39-A6122D2C32DB@employees.org> <CAD6AjGQyatWEOxCpnOn8H+SxG=BWM=cBPaXoON6vA7dj7TNqOQ@mail.gmail.com> <72F5C80C-DDB5-422E-8FEC-7D4157722780@consulintel.es> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DB19757@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <E181152D-C33F-418A-85BC-4F7829BEE16F@consulintel.es> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DB19CFE@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <E3C498E3-25FC-4612-B565-98818DB60AB8@consulintel.es> <ED7BCBE5-C124-4BB4-B42A-D857EC85E484@consulintel.es> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704131022210.27978@uplift.swm.pp.se> <8F80DE9D-0677-4568-B211-9D79067BE22B@consulintel.es> <6772D740-0589-4B28-ACC2-252C6ACB8360@employees.org> <0E84BD53-6022-4681-B8F8-7B64760D023A@consulintel.es> <AF4B7A93-E5B7-4A74-AEBD-826385A07147@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <AF4B7A93-E5B7-4A74-AEBD-826385A07147@employees.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0wz6eiiTSNaIGYt6Rljd9NB591s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:57:57 -0000

No Ole, actually I don’t think I’ve tried it with Linux, just with regular CEs, both from retail and provided by ISPs.

There is no way the CE knows if the tunnel-end-point is a 6rd or a 6in4 or a 6to4, and looking at your link it seems the same to me … may be you can point exactly to what source line/section you think will “break it”?

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: <otroan@employees.org>
Responder a: <otroan@employees.org>
Fecha: jueves, 13 de abril de 2017, 11:44
Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] LISP support for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00

    Jordi,
    
    > Believe me, just try it.
    
    Oh geez... You seem completely stuck with the implementations (Linux based) that you have tried.
    
    > I’ve tried this with many CEs that had a “6rd” choice and NO “6in4”. If you use the configured tunnel end-point parameters to “lie” to the CE, it just works. And this is normal if you look into the details of how 6to4, 6in4 configured tunnels and 6rd work. They do the same, the difference is at the “provider edge”.
    > 
    > The CE don’t “see” any difference between them.
    > 
    > In fact I’ve many customers using it, both residential and SMEs.
    
    Take VPP for example. Does not behave like you think every implementation does:
    https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/src/plugins/sixrd
    
    Ole
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email